Affiliation
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-07-27
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of PhysicsCitation
Shangjia Zhang et al 2023 ApJ 952 108Journal
Astrophysical JournalRights
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Observations of substructure in protoplanetary disks have largely been limited to the brightest and largest disks, excluding the abundant population of compact disks, which are likely sites of planet formation. Here, we reanalyze ∼0.″1, 1.33 mm Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) continuum observations of 12 compact protoplanetary disks in the Taurus star-forming region. By fitting visibilities directly, we identify substructures in six of the 12 compact disks. We then compare the substructures identified in the full Taurus sample of 24 disks in single-star systems and the ALMA DSHARP survey, differentiating between compact (R eff,90% < 50 au) and extended (R eff,90% ≥50 au) disk sources. We find that substructures are detected at nearly all radii in both small and large disks. Tentatively, we find fewer wide gaps in intermediate-sized disks with R eff,90% between 30 and 90 au. We perform a series of planet-disk interaction simulations to constrain the sensitivity of our visibility-fitting approach. Under the assumption of planet-disk interaction, we use the gap widths and common disk parameters to calculate potential planet masses within the Taurus sample. We find that the young planet occurrence rate peaks near Neptune masses, similar to the DSHARP sample. For 0.01 M J/M ⊙ ≲M p/M * ≲0.1 M J/M ⊙, the rate is 17.4% ± 8.3%; for 0.1 M J/M ⊙ ≲M p/M * ≲1 M J/M ⊙, it is 27.8% ± 8.3%. Both of them are consistent with microlensing surveys. For gas giants more massive than 5 M J, the occurrence rate is 4.2% ± 4.2%, consistent with direct imaging surveys. © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
0004-637XVersion
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/1538-4357/acd334
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.