Limit on Supernova Emission in the Brightest Gamma-Ray Burst, GRB 221009A
Author
Shrestha, M.Sand, D.J.
Alexander, K.D.
Bostroem, K.A.
Hosseinzadeh, G.
Pearson, J.
Aghakhanloo, M.
Vinkó, J.
Andrews, J.E.
Jencson, J.E.
Lundquist, M.J.
Wyatt, S.
Howell, D.A.
McCully, C.
Gonzalez, E.P.
Pellegrino, C.
Terreran, G.
Hiramatsu, D.
Newsome, M.
Farah, J.
Jha, S.W.
Smith, N.
Wheeler, J.C.
Martínez-Vázquez, C.
Carballo-Bello, J.A.
Drlica-Wagner, A.
James, D.J.
Mutlu-Pakdil, B.
Stringfellow, G.S.
Sakowska, J.D.
Noël, N.E.D.
Bom, C.R.
Kuehn, K.
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-03-28
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
American Astronomical SocietyCitation
Manisha Shrestha et al 2023 ApJL 946 L25Journal
Astrophysical Journal LettersRights
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We present photometric and spectroscopic observations of the extraordinary gamma-ray burst (GRB) 221009A in search of an associated supernova. Some past GRBs have shown bumps in the optical light curve that coincide with the emergence of supernova spectral features, but we do not detect any significant light-curve features in GRB 221009A, nor do we detect any clear sign of supernova spectral features. Using two well-studied GRB-associated supernovae (SN 2013dx, M r , max = − 19.54 ; SN 2016jca, M r , max = − 19.04 ) at a similar redshift as GRB 221009A (z = 0.151), we modeled how the emergence of a supernova would affect the light curve. If we assume the GRB afterglow to decay at the same rate as the X-ray data, the combination of afterglow and a supernova component is fainter than the observed GRB brightness. For the case where we assume the best-fit power law to the optical data as the GRB afterglow component, a supernova contribution should have created a clear bump in the light curve, assuming only extinction from the Milky Way. If we assume a higher extinction of E(B − V) = 1.74 mag (as has been suggested elsewhere), the supernova contribution would have been hard to detect, with a limit on the associated supernova of M r , max ≈ − 19.54. We do not observe any clear supernova features in our spectra, which were taken around the time of expected maximum light. The lack of a bright supernova associated with GRB 221009A may indicate that the energy from the explosion is mostly concentrated in the jet, leaving a lower energy budget available for the supernova. © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
2041-8205Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/2041-8213/acbd50
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.