Mapping Choice: A Critical GIS Analysis of English Learner Enrollment; [Escolha de mapeamento: Uma análise GIS crítica da matrícula de alunos de inglês]; [Elección de mapeo: Un análisis GIS crítico de la inscripción de estudiantes de inglés]
Author
Sartori, A.C.Affiliation
University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-02-08Keywords
charter schoolsEnglish language learners
Geographic Information Systems
open enrollment
school choice
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Arizona State UniversityCitation
Sartori, A. C. (2023). Mapping choice: A critical GIS analysis of English learner enrollment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7253Rights
© 2023 Aurora C. Sartori. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
In many ways, Arizona is on the forefront of school choice: in addition to a state-wide open enrollment law, it was one of the first states to adopt charter school legislation in 1994 and currently has the second-highest percentage of public school students attending charter schools in the nation. Despite the extensive research on school choice, less is known about whether choice systems meaningfully impart more opportunities for students classified as English learners, a diverse group that has been the subject of multiple discriminatory policies and has one of the lowest graduation rates in the state. The current paper uses geospatial analysis to examine English learner participation in school choice in one Arizona metropolitan area. The results indicate th at charter schools consistently under-enroll EL students regardless of demographic variability across geographic locations. Charter school locational patterns may be one contributing factor to EL enrollment disparities, though they are not likely to be the only reason. Employing a conceptual framework of motility or “mobility capital” (Kaufman et al., 2004) and a critical stance on the spatial dimensions of neoliberal reforms, findings suggest that unregulated school choice may not reliably provide improved schooling options for students classified as English learners. © 2023, Arizona State University. All rights reserved.Note
Open access journalISSN
1068-2341Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.14507/epaa.31.7253
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 Aurora C. Sartori. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.