Time course of inducibility of indirect responses in an ant-defended plant
Name:
Calixto-Time_course.pdf
Size:
843.1Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-03-13Keywords
extrafloral nectariesindirect defense
induced defense
induced response
plant defense
plant–herbivore interactions
protection mutualism
Qualea multiflora
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Ecological Society of AmericaCitation
Calixto, Eduardo Soares, Kleber Del-Claro, Denise Lange, and Judith Bronstein. 2023. “ Time Course of Inducibility of Indirect Responses in an Ant-Defended Plant.” Ecology 104(5): e4029. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.4029Journal
EcologyRights
© 2023 The Ecological Society of America.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Plants have evolved inducible defenses that allow them to minimize costs associated with the production of constitutive defenses when herbivores are not present. However, as a consequence, some plants might experience a period of vulnerability between damage and the onset of defense and/or between the cessation of damage and relaxation of defense. Few studies have examined the time course in the inducible protective mutualism between ants and extrafloral nectary (EFN)-bearing plants. None has compared the inducibility of EFNs on vegetative versus reproductive parts or in response to different levels of herbivore damage. Here, we disentangle the inducibility process by evaluating extrafloral nectar production and ant attendance over time, the time course of inducibility on different plant parts, and the time course of inducibility in response to different levels of foliar damage in a Brazilian tree, Qualea multiflora (Vochysiaceae). Using simulated herbivory on leaves and flowers, we found that (a) the production of extrafloral nectar from foliar and floral EFNs, as well as ant attendance, exhibited a lag between the moment of damage and the peak of response, followed by a response peak (usually 24 h after damage) at which the defense remains at its maximum level, then declines to prestimulus levels; (b) the time course of inducibility and the peak activity did not differ between EFNs located in vegetative versus reproductive parts, except for sugar concentration, which was higher in EFNs on vegetative parts; and (c) the time course of inducibility of foliar EFNs depended on damage level. Although considered a cost-saving strategy, inducible defenses can be disadvantageous since they can leave plants vulnerable to attack for extended periods. Our results illuminate the dynamics of the induced response and the underlying mechanisms that might mediate it, ultimately providing new insights into defense strategies employed by plants. © 2023 The Ecological Society of America.Note
Immediate accessISSN
0012-9658PubMed ID
36912135DOI
10.1002/ecy.4029Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1002/ecy.4029
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Induction and relaxation of extrafloral nectaries in response to simulated herbivory in young Mallotus japonicus plants.
- Authors: Yamawo A, Suzuki N
- Issue date: 2018 Mar
- Plants with extrafloral nectaries share indirect defenses and shape the local arboreal ant community.
- Authors: Moura RF, Del-Claro K
- Issue date: 2023 Jan
- Extrafloral nectary-bearing plant Mallotus japonicus uses different types of extrafloral nectaries to establish effective defense by ants.
- Authors: Yamawo A, Suzuki N, Tagawa J
- Issue date: 2019 Jul
- Variation in Extrafloral Nectary Productivity Influences the Ant Foraging.
- Authors: Lange D, Calixto ES, Del-Claro K
- Issue date: 2017
- Temporal Variation in the Abundance and Richness of Foliage-Dwelling Ants Mediated by Extrafloral Nectar.
- Authors: Belchior C, Sendoya SF, Del-Claro K
- Issue date: 2016