Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCornelison, B.
dc.contributor.authorZerr, B.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-04T07:12:17Z
dc.date.available2024-08-04T07:12:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-22
dc.identifier.citationCornelison, B., Zerr, B. Comparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely. BMC Med Educ 23, 597 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04581-x
dc.identifier.issn1472-6920
dc.identifier.pmid37608266
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12909-023-04581-x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/673594
dc.description.abstractBackground: The COVID-19 pandemic required the University of Arizona R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy’s Self-Care Therapeutics course to be taught as a synchronous, live online course. The course has traditionally utilized a flipped-classroom to increase student engagement and improve learning performance. The goal of this study is to compare student performance in a flipped-classroom self-care therapeutics course taught to students attending class on-campus versus online via web-conferencing. Methods: This study assessed examination performance of 118 students that took the class on-campus in 2019 and 125 students that took the class online in 2020. Course design was similar between the two cohorts, with each completing assigned pre-reading, an associated short multiple-choice quiz, in-class small group discussions and in-class large group faculty-led debrief. Both cohorts took pre-class quizzes and three examinations to assess their knowledge. Exam, quiz, overall class performance, and student experience was compared for the 2019 on-campus attending cohort and the 2020 online attending cohort. Results: No statistical differences were seen in the overall exam performance, the final course score, and the student experience between cohorts. Statistical differences (p = 0.02) were found between cohorts for the overall quiz performance, with the on-campus attending cohort performing slightly better than the online attending cohort (mean score of 88% compared to 84.4%). Conclusion: Examination performance was similar for students taking a flipped-classroom course online and on-campus. Further research using data from multiple courses or from the same cohort, randomized, is needed to improve the internal and external validity of these findings. © 2023, BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd
dc.rightsThis is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/
dc.subjectCourse performance
dc.subjectOnline learning
dc.subjectPharmacy students
dc.subjectSelf-care
dc.subjectTeaching method
dc.subjectTherapeutics
dc.titleComparison of pharmacy student performance in a self-care therapeutics course conducted as a flipped classroom on-campus and remotely
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentPharmacy Practice and Science, R. Ken Coit College of Pharmacy, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalBMC Medical Education
dc.description.notePublic domain article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleBMC Medical Education
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-04T07:12:17Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
s12909-023-04581-x.pdf
Size:
947.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2023. Open Access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.