Flight-Fecundity Trade-offs: A Possible Mechanistic Link in Plant–Herbivore–Pollinator Systems
Affiliation
Department of Entomology, University of ArizonaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2022-04-24
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Frontiers Media S.A.Citation
Davidowitz G, Bronstein JL and Tigreros N (2022) Flight-Fecundity Trade-offs: A Possible Mechanistic Link in Plant–Herbivore–Pollinator Systems. Front. Plant Sci. 13:843506. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.843506Journal
Frontiers in Plant ScienceRights
© 2022 Davidowitz, Bronstein and Tigreros. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Plant–herbivore and plant–pollinator interactions are both well-studied, but largely independent of each other. It has become increasingly recognized, however, that pollination and herbivory interact extensively in nature, with consequences for plant fitness. Here, we explore the idea that trade-offs in investment in insect flight and reproduction may be a mechanistic link between pollination and herbivory. We first provide a general background on trade-offs between flight and fecundity in insects. We then focus on Lepidoptera; larvae are generally herbivores while most adults are pollinators, making them ideal to study these links. Increased allocation of resources to flight, we argue, potentially increases a Lepidopteran insect pollinator’s efficiency, resulting in higher plant fitness. In contrast, allocation of resources to reproduction in the same insect species reduces plant fitness, because it leads to an increase in herbivore population size. We examine the sequence of resource pools available to herbivorous Lepidopteran larvae (maternally provided nutrients to the eggs, as well as leaf tissue), and to adults (nectar and nuptial gifts provided by the males to the females), which potentially are pollinators. Last, we discuss how subsequent acquisition and allocation of resources from these pools may alter flight–fecundity trade-offs, with concomitant effects both on pollinator performance and the performance of larval herbivores in the next generation. Allocation decisions at different times during ontogeny translate into costs of herbivory and/or benefits of pollination for plants, mechanistically linking herbivory and pollination. Copyright © 2022 Davidowitz, Bronstein and Tigreros.Note
Open access journalISSN
1664-462XVersion
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3389/fpls.2022.843506
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 Davidowitz, Bronstein and Tigreros. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.