Evaluating Efficacy of a COVID-19 Alternative Care Site Preparedness Assessment Tool for Catastrophic Healthcare Surge Capacity during Pandemic Response
Name:
healthcare-11-00324-v2.pdf
Size:
3.005Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-01-21Keywords
alternative care sitebuilt environment
catastrophic events
COVID-19
disaster risk management
emergency preparedness
healthcare design
healthcare surge capacity
pandemic response
public health policy
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Scanlon, M.; Taylor, E.; Waltz, K. Evaluating Efficacy of a COVID-19 Alternative Care Site Preparedness Assessment Tool for Catastrophic Healthcare Surge Capacity during Pandemic Response. Healthcare 2023, 11, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11030324Journal
Healthcare (Switzerland)Rights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, implementing catastrophic healthcare surge capacity required a network of facility infrastructure beyond the immediate hospital to triage the rapidly growing numbers of infected individuals and treat emerging disease cases. Providing regional continuity-of-care requires an assessment of buildings for alternative care sites (ACS) to extend healthcare operations into non-healthcare settings. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) appointed a COVID-19 ACS Task Force involving architects, engineers, public health, and healthcare professionals to conduct a charrette (i.e., intensive workshop) to establish guidance during the alert phase of the pandemic. The task force developed an ACS Preparedness Assessment Tool (PAT) for healthcare teams to assist with their rapid evaluation of building sites for establishing healthcare operations in non-healthcare settings. The tool was quickly updated (V2.0) and then translated into multiple languages. Subsequently, the authors of this manuscript reviewed the efficacy of the PAT V2.0 in the context of reported case studies from healthcare teams who developed a COVID-19 ACS in community settings. In summary, policy makers should re-examine the role of the built environment during emergency pandemic response and its impact on patients and health professionals. An updated ACS PAT tool should be established as part of the public health preparedness for implementing catastrophic healthcare surge capacity. © 2023 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2227-9032Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/healthcare11030324
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.

