Scope and financial impact of unpublished data and unused samples among U.S. academic and government researchers
Name:
1-s2.0-S2589004223012439.pdf
Size:
3.329Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Department of Community, Environment, and Policy, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-06-18
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier Inc.Citation
Bowers, E. C., Stephenson, J., Furlong, M., & Ramos, K. S. (2023). Scope and financial impact of unpublished data and unused samples among US academic and government researchers. Iscience, 26(7).Journal
iScienceRights
Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Unpublished data and unused samples are common byproducts of research activity, but little is known about the scope and economic impact of their disuse. To fill this knowledge gap, we collected self-reported anonymous survey responses from 301 academic and government scientists from randomly selected institutions. Respondents estimated that they published ∼60% of their data and 95% had unpublished data. Of those collecting specimens, 60% stored unused samples. Systemic and logistical issues were identified as major contributory factors. The median cumulative self-reported estimated value of unused resources per researcher was $28,857, with life science ($36k) and government ($109k) researchers reporting the costliest assets. Using NSF headcounts, we estimated that the current cumulative value of unused resources at universities is approximately $6.2 billion, about 7% of the current annual R&D budget. These findings provide actionable information that can be used by decision makers to reduce obstacles that undermine scientific progress and productivity. © 2023 The AuthorsNote
Open access journalISSN
2589-0042Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.isci.2023.107166
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license.

