Stakeholder Opinions on the Issues of the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District and Policy Alternatives
Affiliation
Department of Environmental Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, The University of ArizonaWater Resources Research Center, The University of Arizona
School of Government and Public Policy, College of Social and Behavioral Sciences, The University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-03-17Keywords
Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment Districtcontent analysis
interviews
managed aquifer recharge
policy analysis
replenishment
stakeholders
water management
water policy
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Bernat, R.F.A.; Megdal, S.B.; Eden, S.; Bakkensen, L.A. Stakeholder Opinions on the Issues of the Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District and Policy Alternatives. Water 2023, 15, 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061166Journal
Water (Switzerland)Rights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Arizona has been at the forefront of groundwater management since the establishment of the Groundwater Management Act in 1980. The Central Arizona Groundwater Replenishment District (CAGRD) is a groundwater management mechanism that facilitates development in regions of Central Arizona where the use of groundwater is limited by law. Several stakeholders have raised concerns about some of the CAGRD’s operations; however, stakeholders have yet to agree on the definition of the problems, let alone how the CAGRD might be improved. This study uses statistical and inductive thematic content analysis of a survey to determine (1) the CAGRD issues that stakeholders view as problems and (2) whether opinions differ significantly among different stakeholder groups. This study also uses deductive thematic content analysis to examine semi-structured interviews with CAGRD experts in order to find potential solutions to the CAGRD-related issues that are considered problems by stakeholders. The survey results show that long-term uncertainties related to the availability of renewable water supplies and hydrologic disconnect, where groundwater pumping and replenishment take place in different sub-basins, are stakeholders’ chief concerns. Sector affiliation and CAGRD membership status are associated with stakeholders’ opinions on some, but not all, questions. The potential policy changes offered address problems identified by stakeholders. This research will inform forthcoming policy discussions regarding groundwater management in Central Arizona as the state’s decision makers look to improve the CAGRD in the context of water scarcity exacerbated by climate change. © 2023 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2073-4441Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/w15061166
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.

