WINDS Model Demonstration with Field Data from a Furrow-Irrigated Cotton Experiment
Affiliation
Department of Biosystems Engineering, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-04-14
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Maqsood, H.; Hunsaker, D.J.; Waller, P.; Thorp, K.R.; French, A.; Elshikha, D.E.; Loeffler, R. WINDS Model Demonstration with Field Data from a Furrow-Irrigated Cotton Experiment. Water 2023, 15, 1544. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15081544Journal
Water (Switzerland)Rights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The WINDS (Water-Use, Irrigation, Nitrogen, Drainage, and Salinity) model was developed to provide decision support for irrigated-crop management in the U.S. Southwest. The model uses a daily time-step soil water balance (SWB) to simulate the dynamics of water content in the soil profile and evapotranspiration. The model employs a tipping bucket approach during infiltration events and Richards’ equation between infiltration events. This research demonstrates WINDS simulation of a furrow-irrigated cotton experiment, conducted in 2007 in central Arizona, U.S. Calibration procedures for WINDS include the crop coefficient curve or segmented crop coefficient curve, rate of root growth, and root activity during the growing season. In this research, field capacity and wilting point were measured in the laboratory at each location and in each layer. Field measurements included water contents in layers by neutron moisture meter (NMM), irrigation, crop growth, final yield, and actual ETc derived by SWB. The calibrated WINDS model was compared to the neutron probe moisture contents. The average coefficient of determination was 0.92, and average root mean squared error (RMSE) was 0.027 m3 m−3. The study also demonstrated WINDS ability to reproduce measured crop evapotranspiration (ETc actual) during the growing season. This paper introduces the online WINDS model. © 2023 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2073-4441Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/w15081544
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license.