Name:
experimental_research_organiza ...
Size:
4.029Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Management and Organizations, The University of ArizonaDepartment of Neuroscience, The University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-06-13
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
RoutledgeCitation
Schilke, O., Powell, A., & Schweitzer, M. E. (2023). A review of experimental research on organizational trust. Journal of Trust Research, 13(2), 102–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2214202Journal
Journal of Trust ResearchRights
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Trust profoundly shapes organisational, group, and dyadic outcomes. Reflecting its importance, a substantial and growing body of scholarship has investigated the topic of trust. Much of this work has used experiments to identify clear, causal relationships. However, in contrast to theoretical work that conceptualises trust as a multi-faceted (e.g. ability, benevolence, integrity), multi-level (e.g. interpersonal, intergroup), and dynamic construct, experimental scholarship investigating trust has largely investigated benevolence-based trust in dyadic relationships. As a result of the relatively limited set of paradigms experimental scholars have used to investigate trust, many questions related to different forms and types of trust remain un- and under-explored in experimental work. In this review, we take stock of the existing experimental trust scholarship and identify key gaps in our current understanding of trust. We call for future experimental work to investigate ability-based and integrity-based trust, to advance our understanding of the interplay between relationship history and trust, to study trust as a multi-level construct, to focus on the consequences of trust including the hazards of misplaced trust, and to study trust maintenance. To support these lines of inquiry, we introduce an ideal-typical process model to develop or adapt appropriate trust experiments. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Note
Open access articleISSN
2151-5581Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1080/21515581.2023.2214202
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/4.0/).

