Non-potable water reuse and the public health risks from protozoa and helminths: a case study from a city with a semi-arid climate
Affiliation
Water and Energy Sustainable Technology Centre, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-07-05
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
IWA PublishingCitation
J Water Health (2023) 21 (8): 981–994.Journal
Journal of Water and HealthRights
© 2023 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The study estimated the risk due to Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Ascaris, associated with non-potable water reuse in the city of Jaipur, India. The study first determined the exposure dose of Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Ascaris based on various wastewater treatment technologies for various scenarios of reuse for six wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the city. The exposure scenarios considered were (1) garden irrigation; (2) working and lounging in the garden; and (3) consumption of crops irrigated with recycled water. The estimated annual risk of infection varied between 8.57 10-7 and 1.0 for protozoa and helminths, respectively. The order of treatment processes, in decreasing order of annual risk of infection, was found to be: moving-bed bioreactor (MBBR) technology . activated sludge process (ASP) technology . sequencing batch reactor (SBR) technology. The estimated annual risk was found to be in this order: Ascaris . Giardia . Cryptosporidium. The study also estimated the maximum allowable concentration (Cmax) of pathogen in the effluent for a benchmark value of annual infection of risk equal to 1:10,000, the acceptable level of risk used for drinking water. The estimated Cmax values were found to be 6.54 10-5, 1.37 10-5, and 2.89 10-6 (oo) cysts/mL for Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Ascaris, respectively. © 2023 The Authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
1477-8920PubMed ID
37632375Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.2166/wh.2023.283
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Authors. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
Related articles
- Wastewater treatment plants discharges disseminated more Giardia than Cryptosporidium.
- Authors: Onursal A, Icgen B
- Issue date: 2023 Feb
- Assessing the infection risk of Giardia and Cryptosporidium in public drinking water delivered by surface water systems in Sao Paulo State, Brazil.
- Authors: Sato MI, Galvani AT, Padula JA, Nardocci AC, Lauretto Mde S, Razzolini MT, Hachich EM
- Issue date: 2013 Jan 1
- Wastewater treatment performance in microbiological removal and (oo)cyst viability assessed comparatively to fluorescence decay.
- Authors: Medeiros RC, Sammarro Silva KJ, Daniel LA
- Issue date: 2022 Mar
- Occurrence and removal of Giardia spp. cysts and Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts from a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Brazil.
- Authors: Santos PR, Daniel LA
- Issue date: 2017 May
- Assessment of the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and Giardia in non-potable reclaimed water.
- Authors: Ryu H, Alum A, Mena KD, Abbaszadegan M
- Issue date: 2007