Application of Machine Learning and Remote Sensing for Gap-filling Daily Precipitation Data of a Sparsely Gauged Basin in East Africa
Name:
s40710-023-00625-y.pdf
Size:
2.141Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Faramarzzadeh, M.Ehsani, M.R.
Akbari, M.
Rahimi, R.
Moghaddam, M.
Behrangi, A.
Klöve, B.
Haghighi, A.T.
Oussalah, M.
Affiliation
Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-02-13
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Faramarzzadeh, M., Ehsani, M.R., Akbari, M. et al. Application of Machine Learning and Remote Sensing for Gap-filling Daily Precipitation Data of a Sparsely Gauged Basin in East Africa. Environ. Process. 10, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-023-00625-yJournal
Environmental ProcessesRights
© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Access to spatiotemporal distribution of precipitation is needed in many hydrological applications. However, gauges often have spatiotemporal gaps. To mitigate this, we considered three main approaches: (i) using remotely sensing and reanalysis precipitation products; (ii) machine learning-based approaches; and (iii) a gap-filling software explicitly developed for filling the gaps of daily precipitation records. This study evaluated all approaches over a sparsely gauged basin in East Africa. Among the examined precipitation products, PERSIANN-CDR outperformed other satellite products in terms of root mean squared error (7.3 mm), and correlation coefficient (0.46) while having a large bias (50%) compared to the available in situ precipitation records. PERSIANN-CDR also demonstrates the highest skill in distinguishing rainy and non-rainy days. On the other hand, Random Forest outperformed all other approaches (including PERSIANN-CDR) with the least relative bias (-2%), root mean squared error (6.9 mm), and highest correlation coefficient (0.53). © 2023, The Author(s).Note
Open access articleISSN
2198-7491Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s40710-023-00625-y
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.