Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYousef, C.C.
dc.contributor.authorKhan, M.A.
dc.contributor.authorAlmodaimegh, H.
dc.contributor.authorAlshamrani, M.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Foheidi, M.
dc.contributor.authorAlAbdalkarim, H.
dc.contributor.authorAlJedai, A.
dc.contributor.authorNaeem, A.
dc.contributor.authorAbraham, I.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-09T00:14:41Z
dc.date.available2024-08-09T00:14:41Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-14
dc.identifier.citationYousef, C. C., Khan, M. A., Almodaimegh, H., Alshamrani, M., Al-Foheidi, M., AlAbdalkarim, H., … Abraham, I. (2023). Cost-efficiency analysis of conversion to biosimilar filgrastim for supportive cancer care and resultant expanded access analysis to supportive care and early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treatment in Saudi Arabia: simulation study. Journal of Medical Economics, 26(1), 394–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2023.2183680
dc.identifier.issn1369-6998
dc.identifier.pmid36815700
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13696998.2023.2183680
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/673992
dc.description.abstractAims: This study estimated, for Saudi Arabia, the cost-efficiency of converting patients from reference Neupogen and Neulastim to one of two filgrastim biosimilars (Nivestim, Zarzio); the budget-neutral expanded access to supportive care with biosimilar filgrastim and therapeutic care to ado-trastuzumab emtansine thus afforded; and the number-needed-to-convert (NNC) to provide supportive or therapeutic treatment to one patient. Materials and methods: Replicating prior studies, we modeled the cost-efficiencies gained from converting varying proportions of a hypothetical panel of 4,000 patients undergoing six cycles of cancer treatment from Neupogen or Neulastim to one of the two biosimilar G-CSF formulations, using national cost inputs. Cost-savings in USD were used to estimate the additional doses of biosimilar G-CSF and expanded access to ado-trastuzumab emtansine on a budget-neutral basis, and NNC to purchase one additional dose of supportive or therapeutic treatment. Results: Savings from conversion from reference to a biosimilar filgrastim were $3,086,400 (Nivestim) and $3,460,800 (Zarzio). With reference pegfilgrastim, savings from conversion were $11,712,240 (Nivestim) and $12,086,640 (Zarzio). Biosimilar conversion from reference to biosimilar filgrastim enabled expanded access to ado-trastuzumab emtansine ranging from 61 patients (5 days, Nivestim) to 191 patients (14 days, Zarzio). For supportive care, biosimilar conversion enabled expanded access ranging from 8,244 patients (5 days, Nivestim) to 25,882 patients (14 days, Zarzio). For biosimilar conversion from daily filgrastim, the NNC for treatment with ado-trastuzumab emtansine decreased as days of injections increased [5 days: 395 (Nivestim), 352 (Zarzio); 14 days: 141(Nivestim), 126 (Zarzio)]. Alternately, for biosimilar conversion from single-injection pegfilgrastim to daily biosimilar filgrastim, the NNC for treatment with ado-trastuzumab emtansine rose as days of injections increased, being highest under the 14-day scenario (146, Nivestim; 130, Zarzio). Conclusion: This simulation study demonstrated significant potential cost-savings from biosimilar conversion. These savings provide budget-neutral increased access to supportive and therapeutic cancer care. © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectado-trastuzumab emtansine
dc.subjectBiosimilar
dc.subjectcost savings
dc.subjectcost-efficiency
dc.subjectfebrile neutropenia
dc.subjectfilgrastim
dc.subjectgranulocyte colony-stimulating factor
dc.subjectpegfilgrastim
dc.titleCost-efficiency analysis of conversion to biosimilar filgrastim for supportive cancer care and resultant expanded access analysis to supportive care and early-stage HER2+ breast cancer treatment in Saudi Arabia: simulation study
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentCenter for Health Outcomes and PharmacoEconomic Research, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Medical Economics
dc.description.noteOpen access article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleJournal of Medical Economics
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-09T00:14:41Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
2183680.pdf
Size:
1.653Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).