Early versus delayed coronary angiography in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and no ST-segment elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Name:
s00392-023-02264-7.pdf
Size:
1.781Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Hamidi, F.Anwari, E.
Spaulding, C.
Hauw-Berlemont, C.
Vilfaillot, A.
Viana-Tejedor, A.
Kern, K.B.
Hsu, C.-H.
Bergmark, B.A.
Qamar, A.
Bhatt, D.L.
Furtado, R.H.M.
Myhre, P.L.
Hengstenberg, C.
Lang, I.M.
Frey, N.
Freund, A.
Desch, S.
Thiele, H.
Preusch, M.R.
Zelniker, T.A.
Affiliation
University of Arizona Sarver Heart CenterIssue Date
2023-07-27Keywords
Coronary angiographyCritical care medicine
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Percutaneous coronary intervention
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Hamidi, F., Anwari, E., Spaulding, C. et al. Early versus delayed coronary angiography in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and no ST-segment elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Res Cardiol 113, 561–569 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02264-7Journal
Clinical Research in CardiologyRights
© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: Recent randomized controlled trials did not show benefit of early/immediate coronary angiography (CAG) over a delayed/selective strategy in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and no ST-segment elevation. However, whether selected subgroups, specifically those with a high pretest probability of coronary artery disease may benefit from early CAG remains unclear. Methods: We included all randomized controlled trials that compared a strategy of early/immediate versus delayed/selective CAG in OHCA patients and no ST elevation and had a follow-up of at least 30 days. The primary outcome of interest was all-cause death. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated and pooled across trials. Interaction testing was used to assess for heterogeneity of treatment effects. Results: In total, 1512 patients (67 years, 26% female, 23% prior myocardial infarction) were included from 5 randomized controlled trials. Early/immediate versus delayed/selective CAG was not associated with a statistically significant difference in odds of death (OR 1.12, 95%-CI 0.91–1.38), with similar findings for the composite outcome of all-cause death or neurological deficit (OR 1.10, 95%-CI 0.89–1.36). There was no effect modification for death by age, presence of a shockable initial cardiac rhythm, history of coronary artery disease, presence of an ischemic event as the presumed cause of arrest, or time to return of spontaneous circulation (all P-interaction > 0.10). However, early/immediate CAG tended to be associated with higher odds of death in women (OR 1.52, 95%-CI 1.00–2.31, P = 0.050) than in men (OR 1.04, 95%-CI 0.82–1.33, P = 0.74; P-interaction 0.097). Conclusion: In OHCA patients without ST-segment elevation, a strategy of early/immediate versus delayed/selective CAG did not reduce all-cause mortality across major subgroups. However, women tended to have higher odds of death with early CAG. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.] © 2023, The Author(s).Note
Open access articleISSN
1861-0684Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s00392-023-02264-7
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.