Laser light propagation in a turbid medium: solution including multiple scattering effects
Name:
s10053-023-00694-6.pdf
Size:
1.487Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Stamnes, K.Li, W.
Stamnes, S.
Hu, Y.
Zhou, Y.
Chen, N.
Fan, Y.
Hamre, B.
Lu, X.
Huang, Y.
Weimer, C.
Lee, J.
Zeng, X.
Stamnes, J.
Affiliation
Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Science, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-06-19
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Stamnes, K., Li, W., Stamnes, S. et al. Laser light propagation in a turbid medium: solution including multiple scattering effects. Eur. Phys. J. D 77, 110 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/s10053-023-00694-6Journal
European Physical Journal DRights
© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Abstract: We have shown that solutions to the radiative transfer equation for a homogeneous slab yield a zenith radiance reflectance that for collimated beam incidence in the nadir direction can be expressed in terms of the lidar ratio, defined as the extinction coefficient divided by the 180 ∘ backscattering coefficient. The recently developed QlblC method, which allows one to quantify layer-by-layer contributions to radiances emerging from a slab illuminated with a collimated beam of radiation, was used to show explicitly that in the single-scattering approximation the attenuated backscatter coefficient estimated by the new QlblC method gives the same result as the lidar equation. Originally developed for the continuous wave (CW) lidar problem, we have extended the new QlblC method to apply to the pulsed lidar problem. A specific example is provided to illustrate the challenge encountered for ocean property retrievals from space observations due to the fact that a very significant fraction of the signal is due to aerosol scattering/absorption; typically only about 10% (or less) comes from the ocean. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]. © 2023, The Author(s).Note
Open access articleISSN
1434-6060Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1140/epjd/s10053-023-00694-6
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.