Measuring and addressing health equity: an assessment of cancer center designation requirements
Name:
s10552-023-01680-4.pdf
Size:
562.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Semprini, J.T.Biddell, C.B.
Eberth, J.M.
Charlton, M.E.
Nash, S.H.
Yeager, K.A.
Evans, D.
Madhivanan, P.
Brandt, H.M.
Askelson, N.M.
Seaman, A.T.
Zahnd, W.E.
Affiliation
Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-03-20
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Semprini, J.T., Biddell, C.B., Eberth, J.M. et al. Measuring and addressing health equity: an assessment of cancer center designation requirements. Cancer Causes Control 34 (Suppl 1), 23–33 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01680-4Journal
Cancer Causes and ControlRights
© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Purpose: By requiring specific measures, cancer endorsements (e.g., accreditations, designations, certifications) promote high-quality cancer care. While 'quality' is the defining feature, less is known about how these endorsements consider equity. Given the inequities in access to high-quality cancer care, we assessed the extent to which equity structures, processes, and outcomes were required for cancer center endorsements. Methods: We performed a content analysis of medical oncology, radiation oncology, surgical oncology, and research hospital endorsements from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO), American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC), and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), respectively. We analyzed requirements for equity-focused content and compared how each endorsing body included equity as a requirement along three axes: structures, processes, and outcomes. Results: ASCO guidelines centered on processes assessing financial, health literacy, and psychosocial barriers to care. ASTRO guidelines related to language needs and processes to address financial barriers. CoC equity-related guidelines focused on processes addressing financial and psychosocial concerns of survivors, and hospital-identified barriers to care. NCI guidelines considered equity related to cancer disparities research, inclusion of diverse groups in outreach and clinical trials, and diversification of investigators. None of the guidelines explicitly required measures of equitable care delivery or outcomes beyond clinical trial enrollment. Conclusion: Overall, equity requirements were limited. Leveraging the influence and infrastructure of cancer quality endorsements could enhance progress toward achieving cancer care equity. We recommend that endorsing organizations 1) require cancer centers to implement processes for measuring and tracking health equity outcomes and 2) engage diverse community stakeholders to develop strategies for addressing discrimination. © 2023, The Author(s).Note
Open access articleISSN
0957-5243Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1007/s10552-023-01680-4
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.