Author
Van Dyk, S.D.de Graw, A.
Baer-Way, R.
Zheng, W.
Filippenko, A.V.
Fox, O.D.
Smith, N.
Brink, T.G.
de Jaeger, T.
Kelly, P.L.
Vasylyev, S.S.
Affiliation
Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2022-12-05Keywords
binaries: generalstars: evolution
stars: massive
supergiants
supernovae: individual: SN 2012A, SN 2013ej, SN 2016gkg, SN 2017eaw, SN 2018zd, SN 2018aoq
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Oxford University PressCitation
Schuyler D Van Dyk, Asia de Graw, Raphael Baer-Way, WeiKang Zheng, Alexei V Filippenko, Ori D Fox, Nathan Smith, Thomas G Brink, Thomas de Jaeger, Patrick L Kelly, Sergiy S Vasylyev, The disappearances of six supernova progenitors, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 519, Issue 1, February 2023, Pages 471–482, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3549Rights
© 2022 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
As part of a larger completed Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Snapshot program, we observed the sites of six nearby core-collapse supernovae (SNe) at high spatial resolution: SN 2012A, SN 2013ej, SN 2016gkg, SN 2017eaw, SN 2018zd, and SN 2018aoq. These observations were all conducted at sufficiently late times in each SN's evolution to demonstrate that the massive-star progenitor candidate identified in each case in pre-explosion imaging data had indeed vanished and was therefore most likely the actual progenitor. However, we have determined for SN 2016gkg that the progenitor candidate was most likely a blend of two objects: the progenitor, which itself has likely vanished, and another closely neighbouring star. We thus provide a revised estimate of that progenitor's properties: a binary system with a hydrogen-stripped primary star at explosion with effective temperature ≈6300-7900 K, bolometric luminosity ≈104.65 L⊙, radius ≈118-154 R⊙, and initial mass 9.5-11 M⊙. Utilizing late-time additional archival HST data nearly contemporaneous with our Snapshots, we also show that SN 2017eaw had a luminous ultraviolet excess, which is best explained as a result of ongoing interaction of the SN shock with pre-existing circumstellar matter. We offer the caveat, particularly in the case of SN 2013ej, that obscuration from SN dust may be compromising our conclusions. This sample adds to the growing list of confirmed or likely core-collapse SN progenitors. © 2022 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.Note
Immediate accessISSN
0035-8711Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/mnras/stac3549