The influence of large woody debris on post-wildfire debris flow sediment storage
Name:
nhess-23-2075-2023.pdf
Size:
9.641Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Rengers, F.K.McGuire, L.A.
Barnhart, K.R.
Youberg, A.M.
Cadol, D.
Gorr, A.N.
Hoch, O.J.
Beers, R.
Kean, J.W.
Affiliation
Department of Geosciences, University of ArizonaArizona Geological Survey, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-06-07
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Copernicus PublicationsCitation
Rengers, F. K., McGuire, L. A., Barnhart, K. R., Youberg, A. M., Cadol, D., Gorr, A. N., Hoch, O. J., Beers, R., and Kean, J. W.: The influence of large woody debris on post-wildfire debris flow sediment storage, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 23, 2075–2088, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-23-2075-2023, 2023.Rights
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Debris flows transport large quantities of water and granular material, such as sediment and wood, and this mixture can have devastating effects on life and infrastructure. The proportion of large woody debris (LWD) incorporated into debris flows can be enhanced in forested areas recently burned by wildfire because wood recruitment into channels accelerates in burned forests. In this study, using four small watersheds in the Gila National Forest, New Mexico, which burned in the 2020 Tadpole Fire, we explored new approaches to estimate debris flow velocity based on LWD characteristics and the role of LWD in debris flow volume retention. To understand debris flow volume model predictions, we examined two models for debris flow volume estimation: (1) the current volume prediction model used in US Geological Survey debris flow hazard assessments and (2) a regional model developed to predict the sediment yield associated with debris-laden flows. We found that the regional model better matched the magnitude of the observed sediment at the terminal fan, indicating the utility of regionally calibrated parameters for debris flow volume prediction. However, large wood created sediment storage upstream from the terminal fan, and this volume was of the same magnitude as the total debris flow volume stored at the terminal fans. Using field and lidar data we found that sediment retention by LWD is largely controlled by channel reach slope and a ratio of LWD length to channel width between 0.25 and 1. Finally, we demonstrated a method for estimating debris flow velocity based on estimates of the critical velocity required to break wood, which can be used in future field studies to estimate minimum debris flow velocity values. © Copyright:Note
Open access journalISSN
1561-8633Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.5194/nhess-23-2075-2023
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.