Disparities in cannabis use and documentation in electronic health records among children and young adults
Name:
s41746-023-00885-w.pdf
Size:
1.532Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Computer Science, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-08-08
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Nature ResearchCitation
Tavabi, N., Raza, M., Singh, M. et al. Disparities in cannabis use and documentation in electronic health records among children and young adults. npj Digit. Med. 6, 138 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00885-wJournal
npj Digital MedicineRights
© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The legalizations of medical and recreational cannabis have generated a great deal of interest in studying the health impacts of cannabis products. Despite increases in cannabis use, its documentation during clinical visits is not yet mainstream. This lack of information hampers efforts to study cannabis’s effects on health outcomes. A clear and in-depth understanding of current trends in cannabis use documentation is necessary to develop proper guidelines to screen and document cannabis use. Here we have developed and used a natural language processing pipeline to evaluate the trends and disparities in cannabis documentation. The pipeline includes a screening step to identify clinical notes with cannabis use documentation which is then fed into a BERT-based classifier to confirm positive use. This pipeline is applied to more than 23 million notes from a large cohort of 370,087 patients seen in a high-volume multi-site pediatric and young adult clinic over a period of 21 years. Our findings show a very low but growing rate of cannabis use documentation (<2%) in electronic health records with significant demographic and socioeconomic disparities in both documentation and positive use, which requires further attention. © 2023, Springer Nature Limited.Note
Open access journalISSN
2398-6352Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1038/s41746-023-00885-w
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.