Can the orbital distribution of Neptune's 3:2 mean-motion resonance result from stability sculpting?
Author
Balaji, S.Zaveri, N.
Hayashi, N.
Hermosillo, Ruiz, A.
Barnes, J.
Murray-Clay, R.
Volk, K.
Gerhardt, J.
Syed, Z.
Affiliation
Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-07-10Keywords
Kuiper belt: general
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Oxford University PressCitation
S Balaji, N Zaveri, N Hayashi, A Hermosillo Ruiz, J Barnes, R Murray-Clay, K Volk, J Gerhardt, Z Syed, Can the orbital distribution of Neptune’s 3:2 mean-motion resonance result from stability sculpting?, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 524, Issue 2, September 2023, Pages 3039–3051, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2026Rights
© 2023 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We explore a simplified model of the outcome of an early outer Solar System gravitational upheaval during which objects were captured into Neptune's 3:2 mean-motion resonance via scattering rather than smooth planetary migration. We use N-body simulations containing the sun, the four giant planets, and test particles in the 3:2 resonance to determine whether long-term stability sculpting over 4.5 Gyr can reproduce the observed 3:2 resonant population from an initially randomly scattered 3:2 population. After passing our simulated 3:2 resonant objects through a survey simulator, we find that the semimajor axis (a) and eccentricity (e) distributions are consistent with the observational data (assuming an absolute magnitude distribution constrained by prior studies), suggesting that these could be a result of stability sculpting. However, the inclination (i) distribution cannot be produced by stability sculpting and thus must result from a distinct process that excited the inclinations. Our simulations modestly under-predict the number of objects with high-libration amplitudes (Aφ), possibly because we do not model transient sticking. Finally, our model under-populates the Kozai subresonance compared to both observations and to smooth migration models. Future work is needed to determine whether smooth migration occurring as Neptune's eccentricity damped to its current value can resolve this discrepancy. © 2023 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.Note
Immediate accessISSN
0035-8711Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/mnras/stad2026