Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBalaji, S.
dc.contributor.authorZaveri, N.
dc.contributor.authorHayashi, N.
dc.contributor.authorHermosillo, Ruiz, A.
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, J.
dc.contributor.authorMurray-Clay, R.
dc.contributor.authorVolk, K.
dc.contributor.authorGerhardt, J.
dc.contributor.authorSyed, Z.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T20:38:32Z
dc.date.available2024-08-12T20:38:32Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-10
dc.identifier.citationS Balaji, N Zaveri, N Hayashi, A Hermosillo Ruiz, J Barnes, R Murray-Clay, K Volk, J Gerhardt, Z Syed, Can the orbital distribution of Neptune’s 3:2 mean-motion resonance result from stability sculpting?, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 524, Issue 2, September 2023, Pages 3039–3051, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2026
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/mnras/stad2026
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/674210
dc.description.abstractWe explore a simplified model of the outcome of an early outer Solar System gravitational upheaval during which objects were captured into Neptune's 3:2 mean-motion resonance via scattering rather than smooth planetary migration. We use N-body simulations containing the sun, the four giant planets, and test particles in the 3:2 resonance to determine whether long-term stability sculpting over 4.5 Gyr can reproduce the observed 3:2 resonant population from an initially randomly scattered 3:2 population. After passing our simulated 3:2 resonant objects through a survey simulator, we find that the semimajor axis (a) and eccentricity (e) distributions are consistent with the observational data (assuming an absolute magnitude distribution constrained by prior studies), suggesting that these could be a result of stability sculpting. However, the inclination (i) distribution cannot be produced by stability sculpting and thus must result from a distinct process that excited the inclinations. Our simulations modestly under-predict the number of objects with high-libration amplitudes (Aφ), possibly because we do not model transient sticking. Finally, our model under-populates the Kozai subresonance compared to both observations and to smooth migration models. Future work is needed to determine whether smooth migration occurring as Neptune's eccentricity damped to its current value can resolve this discrepancy. © 2023 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherOxford University Press
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectKuiper belt: general
dc.titleCan the orbital distribution of Neptune's 3:2 mean-motion resonance result from stability sculpting?
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentLunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
dc.description.noteImmediate access
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-12T20:38:32Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
stad2026.pdf
Size:
2.672Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record