Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: magnification modelling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
Author
Elvin-Poole, J.MacCrann, N.
Everett, S.
Prat, J.
Rykoff, E.S.
de Vicente, J.
Yanny, B.
Herner, K.
Ferté, A.
Di, Valentino, E.
Choi, A.
Burke, D.L.
Sevilla-Noarbe, I.
Alarcon, A.
Alves, O.
Amon, A.
Andrade-Oliveira, F.
Baxter, E.
Bechtol, K.
Becker, M.R.
Bernstein, G.M.
Blazek, J.
Camacho, H.
Campos, A.
Carnero, Rosell, A.
Carrasco, Kind, M.
Cawthon, R.
Chang, C.
Chen, R.
Cordero, J.
Crocce, M.
Davis, C.
Derose, J.
Diehl, H.T.
Dodelson, S.
Doux, C.
Drlica-Wagner, A.
Eckert, K.
Eifler, T.F.
Elsner, F.
Fang, X.
Fosalba, P.
Friedrich, O.
Gatti, M.
Giannini, G.
Gruen, D.
Gruendl, R.A.
Harrison, I.
Hartley, W.G.
Huang, H.
Huff, E.M.
Huterer, D.
Krause, E.
Kuropatkin, N.
Leget, P.-F.
Lemos, P.
Liddle, A.R.
McCullough, J.
Muir, J.
Myles, J.
Navarro-Alsina, A.
Pandey, S.
Park, Y.
Porredon, A.
Raveri, M.
Rodriguez-Monroy, M.
Rollins, R.P.
Roodman, A.
Rosenfeld, R.
Ross, A.J.
Sánchez, C.
Sanchez, J.
Secco, L.F.
Sheldon, E.
Shin, T.
Troxel, M.A.
Tutusaus, I.
Varga, T.N.
Weaverdyck, N.
Wechsler, R.H.
Yin, B.
Zhang, Y.
Zuntz, J.
Aguena, M.
Avila, S.
Bacon, D.
Bertin, E.
Bocquet, S.
Brooks, D.
García-Bellido, J.
Honscheid, K.
Jarvis, M.
Li, T.S.
Mena-Fernández, J.
To, C.
Wilkinson, R.D.
Affiliation
Department of Astronomy, Steward Observatory, University of ArizonaDepartment of Physics, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-06-10Keywords
cosmological parameterscosmology: observations
gravitational lensing: weak
large-scale structure of Universe
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Oxford University PressCitation
J Elvin-Poole, N MacCrann, S Everett, J Prat, E S Rykoff, J De Vicente, B Yanny, K Herner, A Ferté, E Di Valentino, A Choi, D L Burke, I Sevilla-Noarbe, A Alarcon, O Alves, A Amon, F Andrade-Oliveira, E Baxter, K Bechtol, M R Becker, G M Bernstein, J Blazek, H Camacho, A Campos, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, R Cawthon, C Chang, R Chen, J Cordero, M Crocce, C Davis, J DeRose, H T Diehl, S Dodelson, C Doux, A Drlica-Wagner, K Eckert, T F Eifler, F Elsner, X Fang, P Fosalba, O Friedrich, M Gatti, G Giannini, D Gruen, R A Gruendl, I Harrison, W G Hartley, H Huang, E M Huff, D Huterer, E Krause, N Kuropatkin, P-F Leget, P Lemos, A R Liddle, J McCullough, J Muir, J Myles, A Navarro-Alsina, S Pandey, Y Park, A Porredon, M Raveri, M Rodriguez-Monroy, R P Rollins, A Roodman, R Rosenfeld, A J Ross, C Sánchez, J Sanchez, L F Secco, E Sheldon, T Shin, M A Troxel, I Tutusaus, T N Varga, N Weaverdyck, R H Wechsler, B Yin, Y Zhang, J Zuntz, M Aguena, S Avila, D Bacon, E Bertin, S Bocquet, D Brooks, J García-Bellido, K Honscheid, M Jarvis, T S Li, J Mena-Fernández, C To, R D Wilkinson, DES Collaboration, Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: magnification modelling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 523, Issue 3, August 2023, Pages 3649–3670, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1594Rights
© 2023 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering autocorrelation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in ΛCDM and wCDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlation functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the autocorrelation of the lens bins, indicating that systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show that adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns. © 2023 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.Note
Immediate accessISSN
0035-8711Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/mnras/stad1594