Clinical practice guideline recommendation summaries for pediatric oncology health care professionals: A qualitative study
Name:
journal.pone.0281890.pdf
Size:
773.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Santesso, N.Beauchemin, M.
Robinson, P.D.
Walsh, A.M.
Sugalski, A.J.
Lo, T.
Dang, H.
Fisher, B.T.
Grimes, A.C.
Wrightson, A.R.
Yu, L.C.
Sung, L.
Dupuis, L.L.
Affiliation
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Phoenix Children's Hospital, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-02-21
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Public Library of ScienceCitation
Santesso N, Beauchemin M, Robinson PD, Walsh AM, Sugalski AJ, Lo T, et al. (2023) Clinical practice guideline recommendation summaries for pediatric oncology health care professionals: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 18(2): e0281890. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281890Journal
PLoS ONERights
© 2023 Santesso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Objective To develop a summary format of clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations to improve understandability among health care professionals. Methods We developed a summary format based on current research and used the "Think Aloud"technique in one-on-one cognitive interviews to iteratively improve it. Interviews of health care professionals from Children's Oncology Group-member, National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program sites were conducted. After every five interviews (a round), responses were reviewed, and changes made to the format until it was well understood and no new, substantive suggestions for revision were raised. We took a directed (deductive) approach to content analysis of the interview notes to identify concerns related to recommendation summary usability, understandability, validity, applicability and visual appeal. Results During seven rounds of interviews with 33 health care professionals, we identified important factors that influenced understandability. Participants found understanding weak recommendations more challenging than strong recommendations. Understanding was improved when the term 'conditional' recommendation was used instead of 'weak' recommendation. Participants found a Rationale section to be very helpful but desired more information when a recommendation entailed a practice change. In the final format, the recommendation strength is clearly indicated in the title, highlighted, and defined within a text box. The rationale for the recommendation is in a column on the left, with supporting evidence on the right. In a bulleted list, the Rationale section describes the benefits and harms and additional factors, such as implementation, that were considered by the CPG developers. Each bullet under the supporting evidence section indicates the level of evidence with an explanation and the supporting studies with hyperlinks when applicable. Conclusions A summary format to present strong and conditional recommendations was created through an iterative interview process. The format is straightforward, making it easy for organizations and CPG developers to use it to communicate recommendations clearly to intended users. © 2023 Santesso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.Note
Open access journalISSN
1932-6203PubMed ID
36809380Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1371/journal.pone.0281890
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 Santesso et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Related articles
- Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
- Authors: Eddy K, Jordan Z, Stephenson M
- Issue date: 2016 Apr
- The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
- Authors: Allen D, Gillen E, Rixson L
- Issue date: 2009
- Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
- Authors: Crider K, Williams J, Qi YP, Gutman J, Yeung L, Mai C, Finkelstain J, Mehta S, Pons-Duran C, Menéndez C, Moraleda C, Rogers L, Daniels K, Green P
- Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
- The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
- Authors: Soll RF, Ovelman C, McGuire W
- Issue date: 2020 Nov
- No. 367-2019 Canadian Guideline for Physical Activity throughout Pregnancy.
- Authors: Mottola MF, Davenport MH, Ruchat SM, Davies GA, Poitras V, Gray C, Jaramillo Garcia A, Barrowman N, Adamo KB, Duggan M, Barakat R, Chilibeck P, Fleming K, Forte M, Korolnek J, Nagpal T, Slater L, Stirling D, Zehr L
- Issue date: 2018 Nov