Name:
Schmidt_2023_Planet.pdf
Size:
2.466Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Schmidt, C.Sharov, M.
de Kleer, K.
Schneider, N.
de Pater, I.
Phipps, P.H.
Conrad, A.
Moore, L.
Withers, P.
Spencer, J.
Morgenthaler, J.
Ilyin, I.
Strassmeier, K.
Veillet, C.
Hill, J.
Brown, M.
Affiliation
Large Binocular Telescope, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-02-16
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Institute of PhysicsCitation
Carl Schmidt et al 2023 Planet. Sci. J. 4 36Journal
Planetary Science JournalRights
© 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Decline and recovery timescales surrounding eclipse are indicative of the controlling physical processes in Io’s atmosphere. Recent studies have established that the majority of Io’s molecular atmosphere, SO2 and SO, condenses during its passage through Jupiter’s shadow. The eclipse response of Io’s atomic atmosphere is less certain, having been characterized solely by ultraviolet aurorae. Here we explore the response of optical aurorae for the first time. We find oxygen to be indifferent to the changing illumination, with [O i] brightness merely tracking the plasma density at Io’s position in the torus. In shadow, line ratios confirm sparse SO2 coverage relative to O, since their collisions would otherwise quench the emission. Io’s sodium aurora mostly disappears in eclipse and e-folding timescales, for decline and recovery differ sharply: ∼10 minutes at ingress and nearly 2 hr at egress. Only ion chemistry can produce such a disparity; Io’s molecular ionosphere is weaker at egress due to rapid recombination. Interruption of a NaCl+ photochemical pathway best explains Na behavior surrounding eclipse, implying that the role of electron impact ionization is minor relative to photons. Auroral emission is also evident from potassium, confirming K as the major source of far red emissions seen with spacecraft imaging at Jupiter. In all cases, direct electron impact on atomic gas is sufficient to explain the brightness without invoking significant dissociative excitation of molecules. Surprisingly, the nonresponse of O and rapid depletion of Na is opposite the temporal behavior of their SO2 and NaCl parent molecules during Io’s eclipse phase. © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society.Note
Open access journalISSN
2632-3338Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3847/PSJ/ac85b0
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence.