Management of Free Fillet Flap Transfers in Large Oncologic Resections
Name:
management_of_free.pdf
Size:
847.9Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
University of Arizona, College of MedicineIssue Date
2022-11
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Lippincott Williams and WilkinsCitation
Movtchan, Nellie V. MD*; Kandi, Lyndsay A. BS†; Teven, Chad M. MD‡; Reece, Edward M. MBA, MD†; Rebecca, Alanna M. MBA, MD*. Management of Free Fillet Flap Transfers in Large Oncologic Resections. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open 10(11):p e4689, November 2022. | DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004689Rights
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Background: The fillet flap is a reliable flap for reconstruction of large deformities following oncologic resection. It provides healthy, nonradiated tissue for coverage with the secondary benefit of preserving other potential donor sites for reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective review of the medical records of eight patients who underwent fillet flap reconstruction from 2013 to 2021 at Mayo Clinic, Arizona, were analyzed. Results: Eight patients who underwent four hemipelvectomies, three forequarter amputations, and one below the knee amputation were identified. Patients' ages ranged between 24 and 66 years. All indications for oncologic ablation were curative. Defect sizes ranged from 16 × 20 to 30 × 60 cm. Four pedicled flaps and four free fillet flaps were performed. Indication for free fillet flap was tumor invasion of local vascular structures. There was no flap loss in the pedicled group (follow-up ranged from 1 to 9 years), and one of four free fillet flaps had a successful long-term outcome (follow-up 36 months). Conclusions: Successful free fillet flap reconstruction in the setting of oncologic resection is a difficult task to achieve. Changes to the management of case 3F allowed for a successful transfer. Immediate elevation and anastomosis of the flap before oncologic resection, large caliber recipient vessels and isolation from the zone of injury, protection of the anastomosis, and delay in flap inset all contributed to flap survival. It is our belief that applying these general considerations in large oncologic resections with free fillet flap transfer may aid in successful flap transfer and improve its survival odds. © 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.Note
Open access journalISSN
2169-7574Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1097/GOX.0000000000004689
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).