Statistical Tool Size Study for Computer-Controlled Optical Surfacing
Name:
photonics-10-00286-v2.pdf
Size:
1.138Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
James C. Wyant College of Optical Sciences, The University of ArizonaLarge Binocular Telescope Observatory, University of Arizona
Department of Astronomy and Steward Observatory, University of Arizona
Issue Date
2023-03-09Keywords
computer-controlled optical surfacingfabrication
manufacturing
tool influence function
tool size
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
MDPICitation
Pullen, W.C.; Wang, T.; Choi, H.; Ke, X.; Negi, V.S.; Huang, L.; Idir, M.; Kim, D. Statistical Tool Size Study for Computer-Controlled Optical Surfacing. Photonics 2023, 10, 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10030286Journal
PhotonicsRights
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Over the past few decades, computer-controlled optical surfacing (CCOS) systems have become more deterministic. A target surface profile can be predictably achieved with a combination of tools of different sizes. However, deciding the optimal set of tool sizes that will achieve the target residual error in the shortest run time is difficult, and no general guidance has been proposed in the literature. In this paper, we present a computer-assisted study on choosing the proper tool size for a given surface error map. First, we propose that the characteristic frequency ratio (CFR) can be used as a general measure of the correction capability of a tool over a surface map. Second, the performance of different CFRs is quantitatively studied with a computer simulation by applying them to guide the tool size selection for polishing a large number of randomly generated surface maps with similar initial spatial frequencies and root mean square errors. Finally, we find that CFR = 0.75 achieves the most stable trade-off between the total run time and the number of iterations and thus can be used as a general criterion in tool size selection for CCOS processes. To the best of our knowledge, the CFR is the first criterion that ties tool size selection to overall efficiency. © 2023 by the authors.Note
Open access journalISSN
2304-6732Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.3390/photonics10030286
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).