Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSullivan, J.A.
dc.contributor.authorSamii, C.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, D.G.
dc.contributor.authorMoyo, F.
dc.contributor.authorAgrawal, A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-17T19:50:14Z
dc.date.available2024-08-17T19:50:14Z
dc.date.issued2023-07-31
dc.identifier.citationSullivan, Jonathan A., et al. "Large-scale land acquisitions exacerbate local farmland inequalities in Tanzania." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120.32 (2023): e2207398120.
dc.identifier.issn0027-8424
dc.identifier.pmid37523529
dc.identifier.doi10.1073/pnas.2207398120
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/674495
dc.description.abstractLand inequality stalls economic development, entrenches poverty, and is associated with environmental degradation. Yet, rigorous assessments of land-use interventions attend to inequality only rarely. A land inequality lens is especially important to understand how recent large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) affect smallholder and indigenous communities across as much as 100 million hectares around the world. This paper studies inequalities in land assets, specifically landholdings and farm size, to derive insights into the distributional outcomes of LSLAs. Using a household survey covering four pairs of land acquisition and control sites in Tanzania, we use a quasi-experimental design to characterize changes in land inequality and subsequent impacts on well-being. We find convincing evidence that LSLAs in Tanzania lead to both reduced landholdings and greater farmland inequality among smallholders. Households in proximity to LSLAs are associated with 21.1% (P = 0.02) smaller landholdings while evidence, although insignificant, is suggestive that farm sizes are also declining. Aggregate estimates, however, hide that households in the bottom quartiles of farm size suffer the brunt of landlessness and land loss induced by LSLAs that combine to generate greater farmland inequality. Additional analyses find that land inequality is not offset by improvements in other livelihood dimensions, rather farm size decreases among households near LSLAs are associated with no income improvements, lower wealth, increased poverty, and higher food insecurity. The results demonstrate that without explicit consideration of distributional outcomes, land-use policies can systematically reinforce existing inequalities. © 2023 the Author(s).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNational Academy of Sciences
dc.rights© 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectcausal inference
dc.subjectinequality
dc.subjectland system science
dc.subjectlarge-scale land acquisitions
dc.titleLarge-scale land acquisitions exacerbate local farmland inequalities in Tanzania
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentSchool of Geography, Development, and Environment, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
dc.description.noteOpen access article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-17T19:50:14Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
sullivan-et-al-2023-large-scal ...
Size:
903.7Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 the Author(s). Published by PNAS. This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).