Circling the Wagons: How Perceived Injustice Increases Female Bureaucrats' Support for Female Political Leaders
Name:
circling-the-wagons-how-percei ...
Size:
208.2Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Publisher
Cambridge University PressCitation
Lee DS, Schuler P, Park S. Circling the Wagons: How Perceived Injustice Increases Female Bureaucrats’ Support for Female Political Leaders. Journal of East Asian Studies. 2023;23(2):333-345. doi:10.1017/jea.2022.36Journal
Journal of East Asian StudiesRights
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the East Asia Institute. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
Does female bureaucratic support for female political leaders change over time? Existing research focuses on factors that vary across countries. Little work examines how contingent events within a context impact gender-based solidarity. Drawing on collective identity theory, we argue that high-profile incidents of perceived gender-based injustice against a female president could increase female bureaucrats' support for the leader. To explore this, we leverage a unique setting of a female president's impeachment in South Korea to assess the relationship between gender and bureaucrats' support. Examining support for President Park before and after the impeachment, we find that her impeachment has a gendered impact on support, with female bureaucrats' support increasing and male bureaucratic support remaining unchanged. Furthermore, mediation analysis provides suggestive evidence that the result operates through a heightened sense of injustice. Our findings suggest that support for female political leaders varies not only across countries, but also shifts within governments. Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the East Asia Institute.Note
Open access articleISSN
1598-2408Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/jea.2022.36
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the East Asia Institute. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).