We are upgrading the repository! A content freeze is in effect until December 6th, 2024 - no new submissions will be accepted; however, all content already published will remain publicly available. Please reach out to repository@u.library.arizona.edu with your questions, or if you are a UA affiliate who needs to make content available soon. Note that any new user accounts created after September 22, 2024 will need to be recreated by the user in November after our migration is completed.
Determining air-water interfacial areas for the retention and transport of PFAS and other interfacially active solutes in unsaturated porous media
Name:
1-s2.0-S0048969723023513-main.pdf
Size:
1.812Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Brusseau, M.L.Affiliation
Environmental Science Department, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-08-01
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Citation
Brusseau, M. L. (2023). Determining air-water interfacial areas for the retention and transport of PFAS and other interfacially active solutes in unsaturated porous media. Science of The Total Environment, 884, 163730.Journal
Science of the Total EnvironmentRights
© 2023 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The objective of this work was to determine the methods that produce the most representative measurements and estimations of air-water interfacial area specifically for the retention and transport of PFAS and other interfacially active solutes in unsaturated porous media. Published data sets of air-water interfacial areas obtained with multiple measurement and prediction methods were compared for paired sets of porous media comprising similar median grain diameters, but one with solid-surface roughness (sand) and one without roughness (glass beads). All interfacial areas produced with the multiple diverse methods were coincident for the glass beads, providing validation of the aqueous interfacial tracer-test methods. The results of this and other benchmarking analyses demonstrated that the differences in interfacial areas measured for sands and soil by different methods are not due to errors or artifacts in the methods but rather the result of method-dependent differential contributions of solid-surface roughness. The contributions of roughness to interfacial areas measured by interfacial tracer-test methods were quantified and shown to be consistent with prior theoretical and experiment-based investigations of air-water interface configurations on rough solid surfaces. Three new methods for estimating air-water interfacial areas were developed, one based on the scaling of thermodynamic-determined values and the other two comprising empirical correlations incorporating grain diameter or NBET solid surface area. All three were developed based on measured aqueous interfacial tracer-test data. The three new and three existing estimation methods was tested using independent data sets of PFAS retention and transport. The results showed that the method based on treating air-water interfaces as smooth surfaces as well as the standard thermodynamic method produced inaccurate air-water interfacial areas that failed to reproduce the multiple measured PFAS retention and transport data sets. In contrast, the new estimation methods produced interfacial areas that accurately represented air-water interfacial adsorption of PFAS and associated retention and transport. The measurement and estimation of air-water interfacial areas for field-scale applications is discussed in light of these results. © 2023 The AuthorNote
Open access articleISSN
0048-9697PubMed ID
37120024Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163730
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Related articles
- Comparison of methods to estimate air-water interfacial areas for evaluating PFAS transport in the vadose zone.
- Authors: Silva JAK, Šimůnek J, McCray JE
- Issue date: 2022 May
- Comprehensive retention model for PFAS transport in subsurface systems.
- Authors: Brusseau ML, Yan N, Van Glubt S, Wang Y, Chen W, Lyu Y, Dungan B, Carroll KC, Holguin FO
- Issue date: 2019 Jan 1
- Air-water interfacial areas relevant for transport of per and poly-fluoroalkyl substances.
- Authors: Brusseau ML, Guo B
- Issue date: 2021 Dec 1
- The impact of multiple-component PFAS solutions on fluid-fluid interfacial adsorption and transport of PFOS in unsaturated porous media.
- Authors: Huang D, Saleem H, Guo B, Brusseau ML
- Issue date: 2022 Feb 1
- Adsorption of PFOA at the Air-Water Interface during Transport in Unsaturated Porous Media.
- Authors: Lyu Y, Brusseau ML, Chen W, Yan N, Fu X, Lin X
- Issue date: 2018 Jul 17