Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarlson, S.E.
dc.contributor.authorGajewski, B.J.
dc.contributor.authorValentine, C.J.
dc.contributor.authorSands, S.A.
dc.contributor.authorBrown, A.R.
dc.contributor.authorKerling, E.H.
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, S.A.
dc.contributor.authorBuhimschi, C.S.
dc.contributor.authorWeiner, C.P.
dc.contributor.authorCackovic, M.
dc.contributor.authorDeFranco, E.A.
dc.contributor.authorMudaranthakam, D.P.
dc.contributor.authorRogers, L.K.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-18T05:33:22Z
dc.date.available2024-08-18T05:33:22Z
dc.date.issued2023-02
dc.identifier.citationCarlson, S. E., Gajewski, B. J., Valentine, C. J., Sands, S. A., Brown, A. R., Kerling, E. H., ... & Rogers, L. K. (2023). Early and late preterm birth rates in participants adherent to randomly assigned high dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation in pregnancy. Clinical Nutrition, 42(2), 235-243.
dc.identifier.issn0261-5614
dc.identifier.pmid36680919
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clnu.2023.01.009
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/674548
dc.description.abstractBackground: Intention-to-treat analyses do not address adherence. Per protocol analyses treat nonadherence as a protocol deviation and assess if the intervention is effective if followed. Objective: To determine the rate of early preterm birth (EPTB, <34 weeks gestation) and preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks gestation) in participants who adhered to a randomly assigned docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) dose of 1000 mg/day. Study design: Eleven hundred women with a singleton pregnancy were enrolled before 20-weeks’ gestation, provided a capsule with 200 mg/day DHA and randomly assigned to two additional capsules containing a placebo or 800 mg of DHA. In the Bayesian Adaptive Design, new randomization schedules were determined at prespecified intervals. In each randomization, the group with the most EPTB was assigned fewer participants than the other group. Adherence was defined a priori as a postpartum red blood cell phospholipid DHA (RBC-PL-DHA) ≥5.5%.and post hoc as ≥8.0% RBC-PL-DHA, the latter after examination of postpartum RBC-PL-DHA. Bayesian mixture models were fitted for gestational age and dichotomized for EPTB and PTB as a function of baseline RBC-PL-DHA and dose-adherence. Bayesian hierarchical models were also fitted for EPTB by dose adherence and quartiles of baseline RBC-PL-DHA. Results: Adherence to the high dose using both RBC-PL-DHA cut points resulted in less EPTB compared to 200 mg [Bayesian posterior probability (pp) = 0.93 and 0.92, respectively]. For participants in the two lowest quartiles of baseline DHA status, adherence to the higher dose resulted in lower EPTB (≥5.5% RBC-PL-DHA, quartiles 1 and 2, pp = 0.95 and 0.96; ≥8% RBC-PL-DHA, quartiles 1 and 2, pp = 0.94 and 0.95). Using the Bayesian model, EPTB was reduced by 65%, from 3.45% to 1.2%, using both cut points. Adherence also reduced PTB before 35, 36 and 37 weeks using both cut points (pp ≥ 0.95). In general, performance of the nonadherent subgroup mirrored that of participants assigned to 200 mg. Conclusion: Adherence to high dose DHA reduced EPTB and PTB. The largest effect of adherence on reducing EPTB was observed in women with low baseline DHA levels. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02626299). © 2023 The Author(s)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherChurchill Livingstone
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectClinical trial adherence
dc.subjectDHA
dc.subjectPregnancy
dc.subjectPreterm birth
dc.subjectRed blood cell phospholipid DHA
dc.titleEarly and late preterm birth rates in participants adherent to randomly assigned high dose docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) supplementation in pregnancy
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalClinical Nutrition
dc.description.noteOpen access article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleClinical Nutrition
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-18T05:33:22Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S0261561423000110-main.pdf
Size:
1020.Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).