Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorInglis, G.N.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez-Sosa, P.
dc.contributor.authorTierney, J.E.
dc.contributor.authorWitkowski, C.R.
dc.contributor.authorLyons, S.
dc.contributor.authorBaczynski, A.A.
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, K.H.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-18T05:33:31Z
dc.date.available2024-08-18T05:33:31Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.identifier.citationInglis, G. N., Martínez-Sosa, P., Tierney, J. E., Witkowski, C. R., Lyons, S., Baczynski, A. A., & Freeman, K. H. (2023). Impact of organic carbon reworking upon GDGT temperature proxies during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. Organic Geochemistry, 183, 104644.
dc.identifier.issn0146-6380
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.orggeochem.2023.104644
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/674558
dc.description.abstractGlycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers (GDGTs) have been widely applied to coastal marine sediments to reconstruct past temperature variability. However, coastal environments are characterised by variability in the source, age and/or thermal maturity of different organic carbon (OC) pools and may bias various GDGT-based proxies. Here we analyse TEX86 and MBT5MEvalues within a shallow marine sediment core (South Dover Bridge, Maryland) from the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM; 56 million years ago (Ma)) to explore how changes in OC reworking influence GDGT-derived sea surface and terrestrial temperature estimates, respectively. We demonstrate that TEX86 values are unaffected by an increase in soil- and fossil organic carbon during the PETM. In contrast, we find large and unexpected variations in MBT5ME-derived temperature estimates (∼6 to 25 °C) during the onset and core of the PETM at some sites. This coincides with input of reworked terrestrial OC from the Cenomanian-aged Raritan Formation. However, there is also an increase in the degree of cyclisation of tetramethylated branched GDGTs, suggesting that branched GDGTs are also derived from marine in-situ production. These factors preclude terrestrial temperature reconstructions at this site. We explored whether OC reworking is problematic in other PETM-aged coastal environments. Using GDGT metrics and the Branched and Isoprenoid GDGT Machine learning Classification algorithm (BIGMaC), we demonstrate that TEX86 values are mostly unaffected by changes in OC sources. However, MBT5ME values are affected by marine and/or freshwater overprints, especially in environments with low terrestrial OC input. Taken together, this study highlights the importance of constraining the provenance of different GDGTs in marine and lacustrine environments. © 2023 The Author(s)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectBiomarkers
dc.subjectGDGTs
dc.subjectHyperthermals
dc.subjectReworking
dc.titleImpact of organic carbon reworking upon GDGT temperature proxies during the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalOrganic Geochemistry
dc.description.noteOpen access article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleOrganic Geochemistry
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-18T05:33:31Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S0146638023000906-main.pdf
Size:
2.580Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).