Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZiebell, P.
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, J.
dc.contributor.authorForster, A.
dc.contributor.authorSanguinetti, J.L.
dc.contributor.authorAllen, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorHewig, J.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-18T05:33:33Z
dc.date.available2024-08-18T05:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.identifier.citationZiebell, P., Rodrigues, J., Forster, A., Sanguinetti, J. L., Allen, J. J., & Hewig, J. (2023). Inhibition of midfrontal theta with transcranial ultrasound explains greater approach versus withdrawal behavior in humans. Brain Stimulation, 16(5), 1278-1288.
dc.identifier.issn1935-861X
dc.identifier.pmid37611659
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brs.2023.08.011
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/674560
dc.description.abstractRecent reviews highlighted low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (TUS) as a promising new tool for non-invasive neuromodulation in basic and applied sciences. Our preregistered double-blind within-subjects study (N = 152) utilized TUS targeting the right prefrontal cortex, which, in earlier work, was found to positively enhance self-reported global mood, decrease negative states of self-reported emotional conflict (anxiety/worrying), and modulate related midfrontal functional magnetic resonance imaging activity in affect regulation brain networks. To further explore TUS effects on objective physiological and behavioral variables, we used a virtual T-maze task that has been established in prior studies to measure motivational conflicts regarding whether participants execute approach versus withdrawal behavior (with free-choice responses via continuous joystick movements) while allowing to record related electroencephalographic data such as midfrontal theta activity (MFT). MFT, a reliable marker of conflict representation on a neuronal level, was of particular interest to us since it has repeatedly been shown to explain related behavior, with relatively low MFT typically preceding approach-like risky behavior and relatively high MFT typically preceding withdrawal-like risk aversion. Our central hypothesis is that TUS decreases MFT in T-maze conflict situations and thereby increases approach and reduces withdrawal. Results indicate that TUS led to significant MFT decreases, which significantly explained increases in approach behavior and decreases in withdrawal behavior. This study expands TUS evidence on a physiological and behavioral level with a large sample size of human subjects, suggesting the promise of further research based on this distinct TUS-MFT-behavior link to influence conflict monitoring and its behavioral consequences. Ultimately, this can serve as a foundation for future clinical work to establish TUS interventions for emotional and motivational mental health. © 2023 The Authors
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectApproach versus withdrawal
dc.subjectElectroencephalography (EEG)
dc.subjectMidfrontal Theta (MFT)
dc.subjectRight Prefrontal Cortex (PFC)
dc.subjectTranscranial Ultrasound Neuromodulation/Stimulation (TUS)
dc.subjectVirtual reality
dc.titleInhibition of midfrontal theta with transcranial ultrasound explains greater approach versus withdrawal behavior in humans
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalBrain Stimulation
dc.description.noteOpen access article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleBrain Stimulation
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-18T05:33:33Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S1935861X23018879-main.pdf
Size:
5.871Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).