Specific surface area of soils with different clay mineralogy can be estimated from a single hygroscopic water content
Name:
1-s2.0-S0016706123002914-main.pdf
Size:
3.618Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Affiliation
Department of Environmental Science, University of ArizonaIssue Date
2023-10Keywords
Cation exchange capacityParticle-size distribution
Regression models
Water sorption isotherms
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
Elsevier B.V.Citation
Yan, F., Tuller, M., de Jonge, L. W., Moldrup, P., & Arthur, E. (2023). Specific surface area of soils with different clay mineralogy can be estimated from a single hygroscopic water content. Geoderma, 438, 116614.Journal
GeodermaRights
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
The soil specific surface area (SSA) is an important variable for soil science and geoenvironmental engineering applications, but traditional measurement methods are difficult and time-consuming. Regression models or pedotransfer functions are often used to estimate SSA from other soil properties (e.g., clay content and cation exchange capacity), but these models do not consider the impact of clay mineralogy. Hygroscopic water content (wh) is intimately linked to these soil properties, which suggests that wh may be a better parameter for SSA estimation. This study (i) proposes regression models that estimate SSA from wh at different relative humidity values (5 to 90%) for kaolinite-rich samples (KA), illite-rich or mixed clay samples (IL/MC), montmorillonite-rich samples (ML), and a combination of all samples (ALL) and (ii) compares the performance of the wh models to other published models that comprise clay, silt and soil organic carbon contents and cation exchange capacity. We found that the sample-specific wh regression models accurately estimated SSA for KA, IL/MC and ML samples. For KA and IL/MC samples, the performance of the KA model (e.g., for adsorption, average RMSE = 10.5 m2/g) and IL/MC model (average RMSE = 21.3 m2/g) were better than the ALL-calibration model (KA: average RMSE = 18.7 m2/g; ML: average RMSE = 22.4 m2/g). For ML samples, similar model performance between the ML-calibration model (average RMSE = 41.4 m2/g) and the ALL-calibration model (average RMSE = 41.1 m2/g) was observed. In addition, the model performance of regression models based on wh was superior to models published in the literature that are based on clay, silt and soil organic carbon contents and cation exchange capacity. Overall, this study confirms that a single measure of wh can provide reliable estimates of the SSA while revealing a significant impact of clay mineralogy on model performance. © 2023 The Author(s)Note
Open access articleISSN
0016-7061Version
Final Published Versionae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116614
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).

