The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYan, F.
dc.contributor.authorTuller, M.
dc.contributor.authorde Jonge, L.W.
dc.contributor.authorMoldrup, P.
dc.contributor.authorArthur, E.
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-18T05:33:59Z
dc.date.available2024-08-18T05:33:59Z
dc.date.issued2023-10
dc.identifier.citationYan, F., Tuller, M., de Jonge, L. W., Moldrup, P., & Arthur, E. (2023). Specific surface area of soils with different clay mineralogy can be estimated from a single hygroscopic water content. Geoderma, 438, 116614.
dc.identifier.issn0016-7061
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116614
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/674586
dc.description.abstractThe soil specific surface area (SSA) is an important variable for soil science and geoenvironmental engineering applications, but traditional measurement methods are difficult and time-consuming. Regression models or pedotransfer functions are often used to estimate SSA from other soil properties (e.g., clay content and cation exchange capacity), but these models do not consider the impact of clay mineralogy. Hygroscopic water content (wh) is intimately linked to these soil properties, which suggests that wh may be a better parameter for SSA estimation. This study (i) proposes regression models that estimate SSA from wh at different relative humidity values (5 to 90%) for kaolinite-rich samples (KA), illite-rich or mixed clay samples (IL/MC), montmorillonite-rich samples (ML), and a combination of all samples (ALL) and (ii) compares the performance of the wh models to other published models that comprise clay, silt and soil organic carbon contents and cation exchange capacity. We found that the sample-specific wh regression models accurately estimated SSA for KA, IL/MC and ML samples. For KA and IL/MC samples, the performance of the KA model (e.g., for adsorption, average RMSE = 10.5 m2/g) and IL/MC model (average RMSE = 21.3 m2/g) were better than the ALL-calibration model (KA: average RMSE = 18.7 m2/g; ML: average RMSE = 22.4 m2/g). For ML samples, similar model performance between the ML-calibration model (average RMSE = 41.4 m2/g) and the ALL-calibration model (average RMSE = 41.1 m2/g) was observed. In addition, the model performance of regression models based on wh was superior to models published in the literature that are based on clay, silt and soil organic carbon contents and cation exchange capacity. Overall, this study confirms that a single measure of wh can provide reliable estimates of the SSA while revealing a significant impact of clay mineralogy on model performance. © 2023 The Author(s)
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subjectCation exchange capacity
dc.subjectParticle-size distribution
dc.subjectRegression models
dc.subjectWater sorption isotherms
dc.titleSpecific surface area of soils with different clay mineralogy can be estimated from a single hygroscopic water content
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Environmental Science, University of Arizona
dc.identifier.journalGeoderma
dc.description.noteOpen access article
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.
dc.eprint.versionFinal Published Version
dc.source.journaltitleGeoderma
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-18T05:33:59Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
1-s2.0-S0016706123002914-main.pdf
Size:
3.618Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).