• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
    • Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Volume 1 (2010-2011)
    • Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Volume 1, Issue 2 (2011)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
    • Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Volume 1 (2010-2011)
    • Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Volume 1, Issue 2 (2011)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Farmers' Rights and Open Source Licensing

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    AJELP_1_168_2011.pdf
    Size:
    3.399Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Beck, Ryann
    Issue Date
    2011
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    1 Ariz. J. Envtl. L. & Pol'y 168 (2010-2011)
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ)
    Journal
    Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/675090
    Additional Links
    https://ajelp.com/
    Abstract
    The TRIPS treaty requires that WTO members offer patent or sui generis protections for plant life. Yet, many developing countries oppose intellectual property for plant life because, for those nations, plant IP has proven to be financially, environmentally, and socially detrimental. The farmers’ rights movement has grown out of such opposition and is an effort on the part of interest groups and developing countries to afford subsistence farmers control over farming methods and compensation for their contribution to the world‘s biodiversity. Developing nations and farmers’ rights groups have spearheaded multiple treaties aiming to curtail plant monopoly rights; however, the treaties have been ineffective and the growing strength of plant monopolies in developed countries is unlikely to wane. Meanwhile, farmers need a solution that allows them to maintain control over their farming practices, preserve traditional cross-breeding methods, and receive compensation for their contribution to the state of the art of crop varieties. Open source provides such a solution. An open-source regime protecting farmer-developed plant varieties would utilize intellectual property and copyleft-inspired seed wrap licenses to generate a pool of plant species that farmers could freely grow, improve, and market. Open source programs would further farmers’ rights by protecting farmer-developed resources from predatory monopolization and by providing an entity through which farmers can share information and have a voice in agriculture-related policy-making. Additionally, open source pools would act to conserve biodiversity and promote environmentally-friendly farming by encouraging farmers to cultivate plant varieties adapted to local climates and disease instead of using mass-produced seed and treating heavily with pesticides.
    Type
    Article
    text
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    2161-9050
    Collections
    Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy, Volume 1, Issue 2 (2011)

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.