The UA Campus Repository is experiencing systematic automated, high-volume traffic (bots). Temporary mitigation measures to address bot traffic have been put in place; however, this has resulted in restrictions on searching WITHIN collections or using sidebar filters WITHIN collections. You can still Browse by Title/Author/Year WITHIN collections. Also, you can still search at the top level of the repository (use the search box at the top of every page) and apply filters from that search level. Export of search results has also been restricted at this time. Please contact us at any time for assistance - email repository@u.library.arizona.edu.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFischer, Katherine
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-21T00:06:33Z
dc.date.available2024-09-21T00:06:33Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.citation2 Ariz. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y Fischer (2011-2012)
dc.identifier.issn2161-9050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/675115
dc.description.abstractBackground: Herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) is one of the most pervasive pesticides in the consumer market. Used in the United States since the 1940s, it is the most common active ingredient in commercial weed killer. Some studies have linked exposure to 2,4-D with cancer, birth defects, irregular endocrine function, decreased immune function, and abnormal reproductive capacities. A 2005 study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that 25 percent of 2,4-D samples were contaminated with dioxins, which are carcinogenic, mutagenic, and cause reproductive problems even at minute doses. However, the EPA has discredited some of these studies, stating that they lack a measure of “2,4-D exposure that would allow for an establishment of 2,4-D as the source of any observable effects.” Because of the alleged adverse health risks that 2,4-D poses, the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) filed a petition in November 2008 with the EPA requesting: (1) that the EPA revoke the tolerance limits set for exposure to Herbicide 2,4-D residues; and (2) that the EPA cancel all registrations to sell or distribute products containing 2,4-D. The petition specifically addressed the concerns that: (1) exposure to 2,4-D is disruptive to the endocrine system; and (2) the Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) the EPA mandates for workers who handle 2,4-D offers inadequate defense from these risks.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ)
dc.relation.urlhttps://ajelp.com/
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.sourceAJELP website (September 2024)
dc.titleWrit of Man-Dangerous: Herbicide 2,4-D and the EPA’s Failure to Act
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalArizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
dc.description.noteNot available in Hein Online.
dc.description.collectioninformationThis material published in Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy is made available by the James E. Rogers College of Law, the Daniel F. Cracchiolo Law Library, and the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact the AJELP Editorial Board at https://ajelp.com/contact-us.
dc.source.journaltitleArizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
dc.source.volume2
dc.source.issue2
refterms.dateFOA2024-09-21T00:06:33Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AJELP_2_Fischer_2012.pdf
Size:
248.7Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record