Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCliburn, Andrew D.
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, Hillary M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-21T00:17:10Z
dc.date.available2024-09-21T00:17:10Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citation12 Ariz. J. Envtl. L. & Pol’y 1 (2021-2022)
dc.identifier.issn2161-9050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/675245
dc.description.abstractDespite centuries of federal and state policies that have resulted in extinction or endangerment for multitudes of wildlife species with cultural, ecological, and historical significance to Indigenous nations throughout the United States, many tribes have begun to attempt wildlife reintroduction in and near Indian Country, with or without federal or state support, and sometimes in spite of strident opposition. Recent efforts, including the reintroduction of bison to the Fort Peck and Wind River Reservations, the Nez Perce and Yurok Tribes’ release of California condors, and the Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation’s reintroduction of pronghorn antelope, have shown early signs of success. Tribes attempting to reintroduce endangered, threatened, or extirpated species have used a variety of legal and other tools to further their efforts, sometimes in combinations that reflect unique values or particular history connecting the tribe to the reintroduced species. The focus of this Article is an option that has received relatively little scholarly examination–the Tribal Wildlife Grant Program (“TWG” or “TWG Program”). The TWG Program presents a unique means by which tribes can establish, or reestablish, wildlife management frameworks largely free of federal oversight or intervention, allowing tribes to avoid certain complications of the federal-tribal legal relationship that have impeded many past tribal wildlife management efforts. The Program also allows tribes to choose when and how to partner with states, a significant improvement over other wildlife conservation and management frameworks that used a federalism structure. Finally, the Program provides a mechanism for actualizing inherent tribal sovereignty for tribes that are willing to establish positive laws in connection with their reintroduction efforts.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona James E. Rogers College of Law (Tucson, AZ)
dc.relation.urlhttps://ajelp.com/
dc.rightsCopyright © The Author(s).
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.sourceHein Online
dc.titleComing Home Again: Tribal Sovereignty, the Tribal Wildlife Grant Program, and their Potential for Endemic Wildlife Reintroduction
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.journalArizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
dc.description.collectioninformationThis material published in Arizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy is made available by the James E. Rogers College of Law, the Daniel F. Cracchiolo Law Library, and the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact the AJELP Editorial Board at https://ajelp.com/contact-us.
dc.source.journaltitleArizona Journal of Environmental Law & Policy
dc.source.volume12
dc.source.issue1
refterms.dateFOA2024-09-21T00:17:10Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
AJELP_12_1_2021.pdf
Size:
637.5Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record