Painless Pokes: Implementing Pediatric Procedural Pain Management Strategies in Primary Care
Author
Nicholas, SarahIssue Date
2024Advisor
Lindstrom-Mette, Ambur M.
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
The University of Arizona.Rights
Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.Abstract
Purpose: This quality improvement project was designed to address critical gaps in pediatric procedural pain management by educating medical staff on effective, evidence-based strategies. Background: Despite extensive guidelines underscoring the importance of minimizing procedural pain in children, a persistent knowledge-to-practice gap exists, often resulting in inadequate pain relief for pediatric patients. This oversight can lead to distressing experiences with long-term psychological impacts, including increased anxiety, avoidance of healthcare, and heightened pain sensitivity in later life. Recognizing the urgency of this issue, this project sought to empower medical staff with skills and knowledge to mitigate these effects through targeted, trauma-informed care practices. Methods: A core component of the project was an educational intervention provided to a small sample of six participants. The intervention focused on training staff in best practices for pediatric pain management, with particular attention to procedural pain mitigation techniques. Practical guidance included techniques from the Comfort Positions: A Guide for Parents and Healthcare Professionals by the Meg Foundation, a resource offering accessible, evidence-based methods to reduce children’s pain and anxiety during medical procedures. By fostering confidence in utilizing these approaches, the training aimed to equip staff with actionable strategies to minimize discomfort and build trust with young patients and their caregivers. Results: To measure the intervention’s impact, pre- and post-surveys assessed changes in staff knowledge, attitudes, and willingness to advocate for pediatric pain management. Analysis of these results revealed statistically significant increases in both knowledge and positive attitudes, indicating the effectiveness of education in closing the knowledge-practice gap. Improved willingness to implement pain mitigation strategies and advocate for patients further demonstrates a shift toward more compassionate and trauma-informed care. Conclusions: Increasing awareness and understanding regarding pediatric pain experiences and strategies with which to mitigate them was successful in positively increasing both knowledge regarding pediatric pain and mitigation strategies, as well as willingness to implement them in day-to-day practice. These steps aim to standardize best practices and support a clinic culture committed to pediatric pain management, helping to ensure every child receives empathetic, effective care that prioritizes their well-being and comfort during medical procedures.Type
textElectronic Dissertation
Degree Name
D.N.P.Degree Level
doctoralDegree Program
Graduate CollegeNursing
