Comparison of Methods To Examine Diet of Feral Horses from Noninvasively Collected Fecal Samples
Citation
Sarah R.B. King and Kathryn A. Schoenecker "Comparison of Methods To Examine Diet of Feral Horses from Noninvasively Collected Fecal Samples," Rangeland Ecology and Management 72(4), 661-666, (2 July 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.02.005Publisher
Elsevier Inc.Journal
Rangeland Ecology & ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Feral horses (Equus ferus caballus) have become abundant on public lands in the American West, particularly over the past 10 yr. In areas where they are overabundant, there is risk of habitat degradation. Most previous studies on diet and habitat use of feral horses were conducted more than 20 yr ago; rangelands have changed considerably in that time, so it is useful to revisit horse diets. We conducted a study to examine the diet of feral horses using noninvasive methods and subjectively compare diet analysis techniques. We collected feral horse fecal samples from a sagebrush/pinyon-juniper ecosystem in Colorado in May, August, and October 2014. We analyzed 30 fecal samples from each collection session by both microhistology and plant DNA barcoding. Both microhistology and plant DNA barcoding results indicated horse diet consisted primarily of graminoids (78.5% and 68.8%, respectively, both of which are in greater proportion than availability based on ecological site descriptions); however, the two methods differed in species composition of grasses. Similar to other studies, microhistological analyses underestimated the proportion of forbs in the diet compared with plant DNA barcoding analyses, which showed a surprisingly high contribution of forbs to the diet compared with previous studies. Our results suggest plant DNA barcoding analyses have great potential, although both methods have inherent biases. © 2019Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
1550-7424EISSN
1551-5028ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rama.2019.02.005
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

