Differences in Stubble Height Estimates Resulting from Systematic and Random Sample Designs
Citation
L. Larson, P. Larson, and D.E. Johnson "Differences in Stubble Height Estimates Resulting from Systematic and Random Sample Designs," Rangeland Ecology and Management 72(4), 586-589, (2 July 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.03.007Publisher
Elsevier Inc.Journal
Rangeland Ecology & ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Sampling design influences the accuracy and confidence that an investigator can place on the information derived from a data set. This study was undertaken to quantify the influence of systematic and random sample designs on the estimation of stubble height. Variance estimates, data set range, adequate sample size, and relative variation were greater with the systematic sampling design, and mean estimates were lower when compared with estimates derived from a random sampling design. © 2019 The Society for Range ManagementType
Articletext
Language
enISSN
1550-7424EISSN
1551-5028ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rama.2019.03.007
