Citation
M.L. Russell, L.T. Vermeire, A.C. Ganguli, and J.R. Hendrickson "Fire Return Interval and Season of Fire Alter Bud Banks," Rangeland Ecology and Management 72(3), 542-550, (30 April 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.12.003Publisher
Elsevier Inc.Journal
Rangeland Ecology & ManagementAdditional Links
https://rangelands.org/Abstract
Despite the importance of vegetative reproduction in annual tiller replacement, little is known about the patterns and timing of tiller recruitment from the bud bank, especially regarding fire return intervals and seasons of fire. We examined aboveground plant density, temporal patterns of tiller production, and belowground bud bank dynamics for Bouteloua gracilis (Willd ex. Kunth) Lag. ex Griffiths), Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) A. Löve, and Hesperostipa comata (Trin. & Rupr.) Barkworth following summer, fall, and spring prescribed fires at 2-yr, 3-yr, and 6-yr fire return intervals, and their interactions. Fire treatments were initiated in 2006, and buds were assessed July 2011 through July 2013. Density and number of reproductive B. gracilis tillers increased in 2013 following drought during 2012, unlike H. comata, which decreased reproductive tiller production. Irrespective of fire treatments, B. gracilis produced the most buds (8 − 10 buds ∙ tiller− 1) and H. comata produced the least (2 − 3 buds ∙ tiller− 1), with P. smithii producing an intermediate amount (6 − 8 buds ∙ tiller− 1). Immediate B. gracilis and P. smithii bud mortality did not occur for all season and fire return interval treatments. However, H. comata bud mortality increased immediately following summer and fall prescribed fires. Three-yr fire return intervals increased active buds throughout the 2013 winter and growing season for B. gracilis and P. smithii relative to control plots and 2- and 6-yr fire return intervals. Fire stimulated bud activity of B. gracilis and P. smithii relative to nonburned plots. The aboveground and belowground response of H. comata indicated meristem limitations following fire treatments, illustrating greater vulnerability to fire for that species than B. gracilis and P. smithii. © 2018Type
Articletext
Language
enISSN
1550-7424EISSN
1551-5028ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.rama.2018.12.003
Scopus Count
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Society for Range Management.

