• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 72 (2019)
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 72, Number 6 (November 2019)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • Journals and Magazines
    • Society for Range Management Journal Archives
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management / Journal of Range Management
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 72 (2019)
    • Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 72, Number 6 (November 2019)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    Shifting Cattle Producer Beliefs on Stocking and Invasive Forage: Implications for Grassland Conservation

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    S1550742419300545.pdf
    Size:
    1.923Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Raynor, E.J.
    Coon, J.J.
    Swartz, T.M.
    Morton, L.W.
    Schacht, W.H.
    Miller, J.R.
    Issue Date
    2019-11
    Keywords
    conservation practices
    decision making
    ecosystem services
    grazing lands
    livestock producer
    working landscapes
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Citation
    Edward J. Raynor, Jaime J. Coon, Timothy M. Swartz, Lois Wright Morton, Walter H. Schacht, and James R. Miller "Shifting Cattle Producer Beliefs on Stocking and Invasive Forage: Implications for Grassland Conservation," Rangeland Ecology and Management 72(6), 888-898, (14 November 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2019.07.008
    Publisher
    Elsevier Inc.
    Journal
    Rangeland Ecology & Management
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10150/675936
    DOI
    10.1016/j.rama.2019.07.008
    Additional Links
    https://rangelands.org/
    Abstract
    To advance the dialogue to define sustainable working landscapes, it is essential to include the perceptions, knowledge, and factors guiding decision making. We surveyed livestock producers in the Grand River Grasslands region of southern Iowa and northern Missouri, United States, to gain insight into key factors shaping decision making and perspectives on effective management practices in the eastern Great Plains, focusing in particular on demographic and social change and producer willingness to reduce stocking rate as a conservation practice. First, a longitudinal evaluation of livestock producer demographics in 2007 and 2017 revealed individuals were older and were renting grazing land to a greater extent than in 2007. Second, when making land management decisions, producers in 2017 focused on economic concerns more than environmental concerns compared with more balanced views in 2007. For those who prioritized the environment over economics, this prioritization was related to both higher levels of education and a willingness to reduce stocking rate (livestock production) if there is a positive conservation outcome. In contrast, a lower willingness to reduce stocking was associated with increasing rental acreage and prevalence of an invasive cool-season grass that responds favorably to heavy grazing (tall fescue, Schedonorus arundinaceus Schreb.). Regardless, about 37% of cattle producers representing ∼ 40% of the land area surveyed were at least moderately willing to reduce stocking rates to achieve a conservation outcome. In conclusion, our findings suggest that producers’ need to gain income from livestock may limit the willingness to enact a conservation practice similar to reduced stocking rates. However, there is clearly conservation receptiveness from a segment of the producer community, which indicates potential for improved conservation. © 2019 The Society for Range Management
    Type
    Article
    text
    Language
    en
    ISSN
    1550-7424
    EISSN
    1551-5028
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.rama.2019.07.008
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    Rangeland Ecology & Management, Volume 72, Number 6 (November 2019)

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.