Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBoyte, S.P.
dc.contributor.authorWylie, B.K.
dc.contributor.authorMajor, D.J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T23:56:17Z
dc.date.available2025-02-07T23:56:17Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.citationStephen P. Boyte, Bruce K. Wylie, and Donald J. Major "Validating a Time Series of Annual Grass Percent Cover in the Sagebrush Ecosystem," Rangeland Ecology and Management 72(2), 347-359, (5 March 2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.09.004
dc.identifier.issn1550-7424
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.rama.2018.09.004
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/675955
dc.description.abstractWe mapped yearly (2000–2016) estimates of annual grass percent cover for much of the sagebrush ecosystem of the western United States using remotely sensed, climate, and geophysical data in regression-tree models. Annual grasses senesce and cure by early summer and then become beds of fine fuel that easily ignite and spread fire through rangeland systems. Our annual maps estimate the extent of these fuels and can serve as a tool to assist land managers and scientists in understanding the ecosystem's response to weather variations, disturbances, and management. Validating the time series of annual maps is important for determining the usefulness of the data. To validate these maps, we compare Bureau of Land Management Assessment Inventory and Monitoring (AIM) data to mapped estimates and use a leave-one-out spatial assessment technique that is effective for validating maps that cover broad geographical extents. We hypothesize that the time series of annual maps exhibits high spatiotemporal variability because precipitation is highly variable in arid and semiarid environments where sagebrush is native, and invasive annual grasses respond to precipitation. The remotely sensed data that help drive our regression-tree model effectively measures annual grasses’ response to precipitation. The mean absolute error (MAE) rate varied depending on the validation data and technique used for comparison. The AIM plot data and our maps had substantial spatial incongruence, but despite this, the MAE rate for the assessment equaled 12.62%. The leave-one-out accuracy assessment had an MAE of 8.43%. We quantified bias, and bias was more substantial at higher percent cover. These annual maps can help management identify actions that may alleviate the current cycle of invasive grasses because it enables the assessment of the variability of annual grass − percent cover distribution through space and time, as part of dynamic systems rather than static systems. © 2018 The Society for Range Management
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.
dc.relation.urlhttps://rangelands.org/
dc.rights© 2018 The Society for Range Management. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectAssessment Inventory and Monitoring (AIM) data
dc.subjectBromus tectorum
dc.subjectecological model
dc.subjectinvasive annual grass
dc.subjectModerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS)
dc.subjectsagebrush
dc.titleValidating a Time Series of Annual Grass Percent Cover in the Sagebrush Ecosystem
dc.typeArticle
dc.typetext
dc.identifier.eissn1551-5028
dc.identifier.journalRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.description.collectioninformationThe Rangeland Ecology & Management archives are made available by the Society for Range Management and the University of Arizona Libraries. Contact lbry-journals@email.arizona.edu for further information.
dc.eprint.versionFinal published version
dc.source.journaltitleRangeland Ecology & Management
dc.source.volume72
dc.source.issue2
dc.source.beginpage347
dc.source.endpage359
refterms.dateFOA2025-02-07T23:56:17Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
S1550742418301210.pdf
Size:
8.923Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record