Reconstructions of Columbia River Streamflow from Tree‐Ring Chronologies in the Pacific Northwest, USA
Name:
J American Water Resour Assoc - ...
Size:
2.602Mb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version
Author
Littell, Jeremy S.Pederson, Gregory T.
Gray, Stephen T.
Tjoelker, Michael
Hamlet, Alan F.
Woodhouse, Connie A.
Issue Date
2016-08-04Keywords
climate variabilityclimate change
dendrochronology
drought
snow hydrology
paleoclimate
streamflow
water supply
Metadata
Show full item recordPublisher
WileyCitation
Littell, Jeremy S., Gregory T. Pederson, Stephen T. Gray, Michael Tjoelker, Alan F. Hamlet, and Connie A Woodhouse, 2016. Reconstructions of Columbia River Streamflow from Tree-Ring Chronologies in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 52(5): 1121–1141. DOI: 10.1111/1752-1688.12442Rights
© 2016 American Water Resources Association. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.Collection Information
This item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.Abstract
We developed Columbia River streamflow reconstructions using a network of existing, new, and updated tree-ring records sensitive to the main climatic factors governing discharge. Reconstruction quality is enhanced by incorporating tree-ring chronologies where high snowpack limits growth, which better represent the contribution of cool-season precipitation to flow than chronologies from trees positively sensitive to hydroclimate alone. The best performing reconstruction (back to 1609 CE) explains 59% of the historical variability and the longest reconstruction (back to 1502 CE) explains 52% of the variability. Droughts similar to the high-intensity, long-duration low flows observed during the 1920s and 1940s are rare, but occurred in the early 1500s and1630s-1640s. The lowest Columbia flow events appear to be reflected in chronologies both positively and negatively related to streamflow, implying low snowpack and possibly low warm-season precipitation. High flows of magnitudes observed in the instrumental record appear to have been relatively common, and high flows from the1680s to 1740s exceeded the magnitude and duration of observed wet periods in the late-19th and 20th Century. Comparisons between the Columbia River reconstructions and future projections of streamflow derived from global climate and hydrologic models show the potential for increased hydrologic variability, which could present challenges for managing water in the face of competing demandsNote
Public domain articleISSN
1093-474XEISSN
1752-1688Version
Final published versionSponsors
NOAA CPO SARPae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1111/1752-1688.12442
Scopus Count
Collections
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as © 2016 American Water Resources Association. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.