• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Honors Theses
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Honors Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    PREVALENCE OF INTESTINAL PARASITES AND ANTI-HELMINTH RESISTANCE IN FERAL POPULATIONS IN ARIZONA

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_hr_2025_0002_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    2.027Mb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Adang, Shirin Leah
    Issue Date
    2025
    Advisor
    Norton, Elaine
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    Semi-managed animal populations, such as barn cats and feral donkeys, occupy a unique space between domestic care and environmental exposure, placing them at ongoing risk for gastrointestinal parasite transmission. This thesis evaluated parasite prevalence, diagnostic method performance, and management implications in barn cats and rescued feral donkeys across Arizona. Fecal samples from barn cats (n=22) were analyzed using both passive flotation and centrifugal flotation (CFS) methods. Results yielded a prevalence of 9.1% Hookworms and 0% prevalence for remaining parasites. All positive cases were detected using CFS, while passive flotation failed to identify any infections. An intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis demonstrated low agreement between tests (ICC = -2.3 × 10^-15; 95% CI: -0.400 to 0.408), suggesting the two methods produced inconsistent egg count results overall. These findings highlight the importance of selecting sensitive diagnostic tools when screening semi-managed feline populations with low to moderate parasite burdens. Donkey fecal samples (n=36) were examined using the Modified Wisconsin and McMaster techniques to quantify strongyle-type and ascarid eggs. Strongyles were the most prevalent, with 63.9% of samples testing positive across both methods. Ascarid detection ranged from 22.2-38.9%, depending on method. The Cliff's Delta value was -0.25, indicating a small negative effect size, meaning that the Modified Wisconsin method tends to underestimate Ascarids compared to the McMasters. Additionally, the Bland-Altman plot for Ascarids revealed this negative bias appeared to increase with higher Ascarid counts, showing a proportional underestimation by Wisconsin for larger counts. After administration of oral Ivermectin, the Fecal Egg Reduction Count Test revealed 100% reduction for Ascarids and 0% for Strongyles, revealing evidence of Ivermectin resistance in Strongyles. These findings emphasize the need for species-specific diagnostic strategies, tailored deworming protocols, and regular resistance monitoring in semi-managed animal populations.
    Type
    Electronic Thesis
    text
    Degree Name
    B.S.
    Degree Level
    bachelors
    Degree Program
    Veterinary Science
    Honors College
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Honors Theses

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.