• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Master's Theses
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • UA Graduate and Undergraduate Research
    • UA Theses and Dissertations
    • Master's Theses
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UA Campus RepositoryCommunitiesTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournalThis CollectionTitleAuthorsIssue DateSubmit DateSubjectsPublisherJournal

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    About

    AboutUA Faculty PublicationsUA DissertationsUA Master's ThesesUA Honors ThesesUA PressUA YearbooksUA CatalogsUA Libraries

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    How Does the Language and Structure of ADA Accommodation Policies in High-Stakes Exam Materials Reflect Inclusivity and Support for Neurodiverse Individuals?

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    azu_etd_22094_sip1_m.pdf
    Size:
    398.0Kb
    Format:
    PDF
    Download
    Author
    Lowery, Lori
    Issue Date
    2025
    Advisor
    Burross, Heidi
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Publisher
    The University of Arizona.
    Rights
    Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.
    Abstract
    This study seeks to understand the role of ADA accommodation policies in shaping the experiences of neurodiverse test-takers. By conducting a thematic analysis of policies from major testing organizations including the SAT, ACT, GRE, MCAT, LSAT, and GMAT this research identifies key themes in language framing, policy structure, and implementation inconsistencies. The study applies Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and self-determination theories to assess how accommodations are framed as either essential rights or exceptional provisions. Findings indicate that deficit-based language, complex application processes, and inconsistent implementation contribute to accessibility barriers for neurodiverse individuals. The study concludes with recommendations for policy revisions to foster inclusivity, ensure equitable testing environments, and align accommodation frameworks with best practices in educational accessibility.
    Type
    text
    Electronic Thesis
    Degree Name
    M.A.
    Degree Level
    masters
    Degree Program
    Graduate College
    Educational Psychology
    Degree Grantor
    University of Arizona
    Collections
    Master's Theses

    entitlement

     
    The University of Arizona Libraries | 1510 E. University Blvd. | Tucson, AZ 85721-0055
    Tel 520-621-6442 | repository@u.library.arizona.edu
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2017  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.