Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBingham, Jenny
dc.contributor.advisorAxon, David
dc.contributor.advisorScovis, Nicki
dc.contributor.authorUnwin, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorDuran, Mariah
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Kelsi
dc.contributor.authorUllah, Humza
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-17T17:41:55Z
dc.date.available2025-09-17T17:41:55Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/678554
dc.descriptionClass of 2024 Abstracten_US
dc.description.abstractSpecific Aims: Identify facilitators and barriers for community pharmacists providing Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) and/or Diabetes Prevention Programs (DPP) services. Methods: A 68-item exploratory questionnaire was administered via Qualtrics to United States community pharmacists between February and March 2024 to collect perceived barriers and facilitators to DSMES and DPP services using a 5-point scale (strong barrier, minor barrier, indifferent, facilitator, strong facilitator). Barriers and facilitators included patient awareness, contracting with medical insurance plans, space/physical location for services, physical equipment, referral sources for patients, accreditation/recognition requirements, ability to submit medical claims, and reimbursement for services. Data were summarized using frequencies and percentages for strong/minor barriers, indifferent, and strong/minor facilitators. Results: The questionnaire was completed by 70 pharmacists, most of whom had earned a Doctor of Pharmacy degree (78%) and were currently practicing community pharmacy in Arizona (75%). Participants identified DSMES perceived barriers as insurance reimbursement processes (63.1%), staffing shortages (60.3%), and contracting with insurance (58.8%). DPP barriers include contracting with medical insurance plans (60.3%) and patient awareness/engagement (49.2%). Facilitators identified are staff expertise (DSMES=40%, DPP=42%), referral sources for patients (DSMES=38%, DPP=33%), available equipment (DSMES=28%, DPP=28%), and patient engagement (DSMES=28%, DPP=30%). Conclusions: Challenges exist in providing DSMES and DPP services, including patient engagement, insurance reimbursement and processing, and staffing shortages. Key facilitators include staff expertise, referrals, resources, and patient engagement. Support in addressing barriers is required to further improve diabetes services.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectDiabetes self-management education and support (DSMES)en_US
dc.subjectDiabetes Prevention Programs (DPP)en_US
dc.subjectQuestionnaireen_US
dc.subjectCommunity Pharmaciesen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.meshDiabetes Mellitusen_US
dc.subject.meshSelf-Managementen_US
dc.subject.meshSurveys and Questionnairesen_US
dc.subject.meshHealth Services Accessibilityen_US
dc.subject.meshPharmaciesen_US
dc.subject.meshUnited Statesen_US
dc.titleBarriers and Facilitators to Providing Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support and/or Diabetes Prevention Programs in Community Pharmaciesen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Arizonaen_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item is part of the Pharmacy Student Research Projects collection, made available by the College of Pharmacy and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact Jennifer Martin, Librarian and Clinical Instructor, Pharmacy Practice and Science, jenmartin@arizona.edu.en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record