Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAxon, Rhys
dc.contributor.advisorVadiei, Nina
dc.contributor.authorBin Zager, Sahr
dc.contributor.authorRath, Leah
dc.contributor.authorSampson, Uju
dc.contributor.authorTan, Jackie
dc.contributor.authorVelasco, Kayleen
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-24T21:05:13Z
dc.date.available2025-09-24T21:05:13Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/678601
dc.descriptionClass of 2024 Abstracten_US
dc.description.abstractSpecific Aims: To identify and evaluate naloxone distribution methods in the United States (U.S.). Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched between January 2013 and June 2023 to identify U.S. based studies that evaluated programs, initiatives, and laws relating to naloxone dispensing or distribution. The four databases were searched using polyglot search queries that included terms such as naloxone, opioid overdose, dispensing, distribution, naloxone use education, and harm reduction. Articles obtained from the search queries were each screened by two independent reviewers for mentions of programs and initiatives in the U.S. that included opioid education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs, pharmacies dispensing naloxone under standing orders, and take-home naloxone rescue kits. Articles were included if they had outcomes or data on the prevalence of opioid-related deaths post-intervention. Data on where naloxone was distributed, method of naloxone access, naloxone administration route, and cost-effectiveness were extracted by two independent reviewers. Results: Five articles were identified with evaluations of programs, initiatives, and laws that broadened access to naloxone. One study evaluated naloxone access laws across the U.S. Four studies looked at the effectiveness of OEND programs with or without additional training for persons who use opioids (PWUO) or healthcare professionals. One study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of intranasal naloxone distribution. Conclusions: Naloxone is commonly distributed through community OEND programs. However, in areas where an OEND program was not available, naloxone was often provided through take-home kits, standing orders, and individually dispensed in pharmacies.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe University of Arizona.en_US
dc.rightsCopyright © is held by the author.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectNaloxone Distributionen_US
dc.subjectOpioid Education and Naloxone Distribution (OEND)en_US
dc.subjectHarm Reduction Strategiesen_US
dc.subjectScoping Reviewen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.meshNaloxoneen_US
dc.subject.meshUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.meshHarm Reductionen_US
dc.subject.meshScoping Review as Topicen_US
dc.subject.meshMedication Systemen_US
dc.titleNaloxone dispensing models in the United States: A scoping review of the literature evaluating the outcomes and prevalence of implemented naloxone distribution methodsen_US
dc.typetexten_US
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Arizonaen_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item is part of the Pharmacy Student Research Projects collection, made available by the College of Pharmacy and the University Libraries at the University of Arizona. For more information about items in this collection, please contact Jennifer Martin, Librarian and Clinical Instructor, Pharmacy Practice and Science, jenmartin@arizona.edu.en_US


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record