Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalker, Tammi
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-01T17:14:09Z
dc.date.available2025-10-01T17:14:09Z
dc.date.issued2025-09
dc.identifier.citation59 UC Davis Law Review Online 69 (September 2025)en_US
dc.identifier.issn0197-4564
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10150/678615
dc.description.abstractThe structural foundations of Title IX enforcement are undergoing a profound transformation. President Trump’s 2025 executive order initiating the closure of the Department of Education, combined with the vacatur of the 2024 Title IX regulations and the Supreme Court’s elimination of Chevron deference in Loper Bright, has fundamentally dismantled the administrative framework that long anchored Title IX protections. Unlike prior regulatory shifts, these developments raise the question of whether meaningful federal enforcement will continue to exist at all. As administrative structures recede, courts will assume a much greater role in defining Title IX’s scope and enforceability, despite their institutional limitations. This Article argues that the resulting shift will narrow substantive protections, restrict access to justice, and produce fragmented interpretations of Title IX across jurisdictions. It examines the statute’s original design as an evolving administrative framework, explores the barriers marginalized students will face under a litigation-driven model, and explains why courts are ill-equipped to provide consistent, forward-looking guidance. This Article concludes by considering potential legislative reforms to restore national coordination in Title IX enforcement, drawing lessons from Congress’s intervention following Grove City College v. Bell.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUC Davis School of Lawen_US
dc.rightsCopyright © 2025 Tammi Walker.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/en_US
dc.subjectTitle IXen_US
dc.subjectDepartment of Educationen_US
dc.subjectOffice for Civil Rightsen_US
dc.subjectsubstantive protectionsen_US
dc.subjectAccess to Justiceen_US
dc.titleNo Department, No Enforcement: Title IX After the Collapse of the Department of Educationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Arizona, James E. Rogers College of Lawen_US
dc.identifier.journalUC Davis Law Review Onlineen_US
dc.description.noteImmediate accessen_US
dc.description.collectioninformationThis item from the UA Faculty Publications collection is made available by the University of Arizona with support from the University of Arizona Libraries. If you have questions, please contact us at repository@u.library.arizona.edu.en_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
refterms.dateFOA2025-10-01T17:14:16Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Walker_No_Department_No_Enforc ...
Size:
268.4Kb
Format:
PDF
Description:
Final Published Version

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record